Why is Cirelli signing an offer sheet for anything under 6.5 per?
I don't think he'd be looking at anything above 5-5.5 in a regular situation.
Why is Cirelli signing an offer sheet for anything under 6.5 per?
2d rounder means AAV under $4.23M
Offer Sheet Calculator - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
$2,113,717 - $4,227,4371 Second Round Pick
but i always find the Offer Sheet proposals here kinda irrelevant,
making the offer doesn't mean player will sign it
i was surprised Aho signed w Habs last year, but they do have a handful of young Finns, that might have appealed
I don't think he'd be looking at anything above 5-5.5 in a regular situation.
"Henrik, have we shown you the executive suites for management yet?"How are we affording him?
Reg situation, yes.
If I'm Cirelli, to get me to leave Tampa??
6.5 to 7.0 easily
"No, I have no idea what's in that bag. I'm going to step outside for a moment. Why don't you check?""Henrik, have we shown you the executive suites for management yet?"
I was responding to another poster that brought up the offer sheet for Cirelli.Why is Cirelli signing an offer sheet for anything under 6.5 per?
I don't think Shesterkin has the value to other teams that he has to us
Yeah, I imagine Fox will probably be getting the A not too long after Staal is off the roster.
ADA has a chance to be our cale makar next season. sign him.
Tampa already traded DeAngelo. Doubt they want him back.I have seen people speak highly of Tony on NYR boards but this is a new one for sure. He is a great offensive defenseman BUT he will never move ahead of Fox and Trouba on the right hand side. After winning the Kakko and Lafreniere lotteries, I disagree with paying a third pairing, "drives offense on his own" defenseman $5M+ per year.
Is there really no trade partner out there who has a lot of forward/center depth but needs an affordable top 4 RHD? Los Angeles? Tampa?
I have seen people speak highly of Tony on NYR boards but this is a new one for sure. We would be lucky if Fox panned out to be as good as Makar.
Tony is a great offensive defenseman BUT he will never move ahead of Fox and Trouba on the right hand side. After winning the Kakko and Lafreniere lotteries, I disagree with paying a third pairing, "drives offense on his own" defenseman $5M+ per year.
Is there really no trade partner out there who has a lot of forward/center depth but needs an affordable top 4 RHD? Los Angeles? Tampa?
No chance.Would you do Cirelli for Fox straight up? I honestly wouldn't
My first thought tooIt's weird how we're talking about people older than Makar developing into Makar.
It's weird how we're talking about people older than Makar developing into Makar.
Would Hanafin work well as a partner for Trouba? Just spitballing.
The only trick for a Cirelli offer sheet is that Tampa has an advantage in regards to total salary because of how OS compensation works.
They could offer (theoretically, of course) him an 8 year/44M salary for a 5.5M AAV, but if the Rangers were to offer him the same total salary for a 5-7 year deal, it would be an 8.8M AAV (in terms of compensation, for the cap it would be calculated as normal). That compensation tier is two 1st + 2nd + 3rd.
I don't think his camp would want an 8 year deal or encourage him to sign an offersheet that long either. They'd want something that takes him to around the UFA eligibility mark, which is 4 years away (7/15 birthday but already 3 years complete in NHL).
That being said, the Rangers could definitely throw him a 5-year OS deal around 27.5M salary (1st+3rd for compensation b/c 5.5M AAV both actual and compensation), which should hamper Tampa a bit, assuming they don't find a way to move many contracts. Again, to re-iterate, they can get to ~11M in space if they move all of there non-clause contracts (excluding Point/Vasi), but that would also take a decent chunk out of roster.
Looking at Anaheim, they really have no RD over there. They have a lot of prospects but i doubt they trade Steel. Would Lundestrom interest us? Only issue is he's a future guy, won't really help right now or any of their LD?
It's weird how we're talking about people older than Makar developing into Makar.