I’ll preface this by saying this isn’t my preference or proposal but something I’ve become increasingly convinced is likely.
The team obviously is going to treat this current core and window as a legit opportunity to win a Cup and build off last year’s run.
Malkin and the Penguins seem to be at an impasse and Malkin has essentially said he’d like to play for MTL or NYR. MTL is not going to be a contender any time soon. NY is viewed as a contender currently. Drury will definitely kick those tires.
And Malkin, although health being an issue, is still a point per game player. Having a chip on his shoulder and playing with Panarin in NYC may reinvigorate both. That said, I’m still not keen on the idea.
However, we have a big reluctance to move any of our high ceiling kids right now and most don’t want to. The asset cost for a Miller, Scheifele, PLD, etc. would be significant. Malkin would only cost a contract so the question becomes very simple - what will Malkin accept to take a shot on a team that is viewed as a contender. Would he take less term if he’s leaving Pittsburgh to make sure he’s happy where he goes rather seeking 4 years like he reportedly wanted from Pittsburgh? Would he take a modest deal to play for a contender with another Russian?
I still think there would be a lot of risk involved, more regarding whether he can stay healthy than his actual skill decline. If he could come in on a 2 year deal it would allow Chytil more runway to keep developing and kick the can on a true center decision down the road for us. I think Malkin, if healthy and motivated CAN be a good 2C for us, but I think it’s unlikely he’d stay healthy and then we’d need to back fill with Chytil/Goodrow, etc.
As I said, I’m not proposing or supporting this, but based on the team’s desire to add a 2C, Malkin’s perceived pedigree and the opportunity to not lose any assets, I can see Drury trying to swing this. This post is more me preparing for Malkin’s ugly ass to be a Ranger than advocacy if for it.
Panarin - Malkin - Kravtsov ? All hall of famers, right Ed?