jay from jersey
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2008
- 6,384
- 4,726
You will not be in your sweet spot for all 4 years. That is my point. Maybe two of them.
Eichel is a wonderful player. And with tunnel vision, of course he should be pursued. But when you start to consider all the costs, what the landscape is right after the trade does not appear to have such firm footing.
all gona depend on the cost and managements feelings towards what kind of contract Zibby is going to want. Realistically, your top 2 lines get the most ice time/ pp time. For the future I think they see it as
LaF- Zibby/ trade- buch/Kravstov
Panarin- ???/trade- kakko
a myriad of cheap UFA s and kids make up the bottom 6 along with kreider, who will also be on PP.
for arguments sake, say Chytil, buch/ Kravstov , Lundkvist/ Robertson, 1st. Do you do it to plug that 1C hole for 5 years?? I would. Then flip Zibby for Tuch and a 1st and go from there maybe?? I don’t know. But that package isn’t crushing to the rangers as many see it. I think Eichel would succeed here. Maybe even explode playing with panarin or LaF like strome did x 2. Who knows
Last edited: