Tob
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2017
- 16,899
- 37,842
As is Zac Jones imo. Call me noodles but if I HAD to part with either Nils or Schneider. I'd part with Nils.Schneider has great physical tools. Lundkvist is one of the smartest defensemen in the world not in the NHL. I'm biased but I only rate Lundkvist so highly because he has the chance to be special with a floor no lower than that of Schneider or Robertson.
It's no knock on Schneider by any means, but I've been a big fan of the Robertson pick since day one. He's crazy underrated.
Let’s be buyers now!
I’m sure there would be other pieces to make that work but that’s my main thinking on the actual value portion of any deal.Cannot really do that without salary going back the other way.
Young NHLer (Chytil)
“A” Prospect (Kravtsov, Lundkvist, Schneider)
“B” Prospect (Robertson, Jones, Barron)
1st 2021 (most likely top 15) & 2nd 2022
OR
1st 2022 & conditional 2nd 2023 (becomes a 1st if Rangers win a round of the playoffs in either 2022 or 2023)
That would be my Eichel offer.
I see now what people meant by Sabres fans being obnoxious. They expect a player of equal value for Eichel. What's the point of the trade then. Apparently Chytil, Kakko, Strome, and maybe Kravtsov (depending on when the edit was made) is not enough.
They’re unrealistic but I sympathize. The broader implications of trading Eichel suck for the fansI see now what people meant by Sabres fans being obnoxious. They expect a player of equal value for Eichel. What's the point of the trade then. Apparently Chytil, Kakko, Strome, and maybe Kravtsov (depending on when the edit was made) is not enough.
That is certainly a most ridiculous idea haha.If the NHL really wanted parity, they'd set each team's salary cap limit based on their previous season's performance.
This would, of course, be ridiculous, but you would certainly have parity.
They are all off they’re meds. Don’t take it personal broski. They think Eichel is mixed with Jesus and a player of his echelon hasn’t been moved since the great oneI see now what people meant by Sabres fans being obnoxious. They expect a player of equal value for Eichel. What's the point of the trade then. Apparently Chytil, Kakko, Strome, and maybe Kravtsov (depending on when the edit was made) is not enough.
Buffalo is going to demand, and rightfully so, Chytil as the young ready to play center. They will not have interest in Strome. And then Buchnevich becomes the young top-2 line forward that is also ready to play and is already producing.I’m sure there would be other pieces to make that work but that’s my main thinking on the actual value portion of any deal.
Where it would go sideways for any team trading for him is that in your deal mentioned there really isn't any cap hit or salary going the other way. That just wouldn't really happen in Todays NHL. Lets ssay Buff took Lundqvist and Robertson in the deal with Chytil. It's offset $7,444,323
$10,000,000 Total Cap
Eichel $10,000,000 UFA 2026/27
For
$2,555,677 Total Cap
Chytil $894,000 RFA 2021/22
Lundqvist $925,000 RFA 2022/23
Robertson $811,667
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Maybe something like the below...
1 of
Strome $4,500,000 or Buchnevich $3,250,000
1 of
Kravtsov $925,000, Lundkvist (?), Schneider $925,000
Tony DeAngelo half retained
A B Prospect (Jones, Barron, Robertson)
I don’t expect the Rangers to be in the hunt for a draft lottery beyond this summer so they can change the rules all they want
We were going to pick 14th overall last year before we won the lottery and currently sit 9th with a cornucopia of games in hand on 10th, 11th, and 12th.Good luck with that lol
The fact that us winning it multiple times forced a rule change after what Pittsburgh and Edmonton got away with absolutely trucks any silly idea that it was rigged for us.