True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
They are not over the barrel here. If the presumption is that they “have to trade him”, I believe it’s an erroneous axiomYes they are if the Rangers offer the best package talent wise.
They are not over the barrel here. If the presumption is that they “have to trade him”, I believe it’s an erroneous axiomYes they are if the Rangers offer the best package talent wise.
Many seem to think he is playing thru a shoulder injury that requires surgery. He def starting to hate it there though IMOI dont care if its Barkov or Eichel but either would be perfect. They are top 10 players in this league. Both fit exactly what this team needs.
Eichel is playing uninspired hockey. He is starting to hate his time in Buffalo and its showing on the ice and in his demeanor. He isnt damaged goods. How would you feel being that talented in the nhl and having all that happen to him in buffalo in 5 years? Its rough on a person.
If one goes back and looks at how much discontented young players in their prime were traded for, it's nowhere close to what's being thrown around here. Also considering Eichel has a $10 million cap hit, unless Buffalo retains 20-25%, they're not getting close to multiple 1st's AND blue chip prospects.What would be your guess?
Larry B. must be reading the board.
Mika Zibanejad’s disastrous decline raises Jack Eichel question for Rangers
https://nypost.com/2021/02/21/mika-zibanejads-rangers-decline-raises-jack-eichel-question/
To be honest, not sure how to make the cash work. Or maybe that is the Buch part of the deal. But I cannot see how Chytil is not part of a potential trade.
Agreed in theory. But as you say, it is hard to imagine right now. And would Buffalo be willing to pay, say $9-10m for him? Hard to envision right now. Chytil is controlled for a number of years. Mika’s contract reckoning is coming it 2 years.At this second, it's tough. Really, and this has nothing to do with his current slump, but Zibanejad really should be the center going the other way.
Theres no shot in hell if they acquire Eichel that LaF or Panarin aren’t stapled to his left. He is a shooter, whereas Barkov is the more all around complete player. Eichel can pass too, not doubt about that but when he’s on top of his game he’s firing pucks at the netIf one goes back and looks at how much discontented young players in their prime were traded for, it's nowhere close to what's being thrown around here. Also considering Eichel has a $10 million cap hit, unless Buffalo retains 20-25%, they're not getting close to multiple 1st's AND blue chip prospects.
Buffalo is going to want some pieces for now and aren't going to go for a strictly futures package, IMO.
My best guess if Eichel is dealt to the Rangers? It happens at the draft or in the time between the draft and free agency this offseason.
Kravtsov is the headlining blue chip prospect, Chytil as the young NHL ready piece, and a decent LHD prospect akin to Robertson or Jones, and a conditional 2022 1st (becomes a 1st if Rangers make the playoffs in 2022, otherwise a 2nd rounder) for Eichel with no cap dollars retained and a depth Buffalo forward like Girgensons or Reider.
Zibanejad then gets dealt to a team looking for a shakeup like Calgary, Minnesota, Arizona, or Nashville for something close to a Marian Gaborik like return (young top 9 center that team soured on but still has promise (Brassard), a good bottom six forward (Dorsett), and a competent #4 or #5 defenseman (John Moore).
I like Calgary and Minnesota the most as Zibanejad trade targets all things considered between their likelihood to deal and having pieces that the Rangers would find desirable.
Buchnevich extended. Deangelo is traded somewhere for a reclamation project at a similar cap hit or is bought out.
It may make a lot of people upset, but that the end of the day, the Rangers are a better team moving forward and they keep all of their good, young players in Laf, Kakko, Fox, Miller, Lundkvist, Shestorkin, one of Robertson or Jones, and Schneider.
You're looking at this for 2021-22 opening night:
Kreider-Eichel-Kakko
Lafreniere-Trade-Buchnevich
Panarin-Strome-Trade
Girgensons/Reider-Howden-Blackwell
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Trouba
Trade-Lundkvist
Igor
Kinkaid/Vet Backup
Georgiev or Gauthier lost to expansion.
Panarin feasts on the bad matchups against 2nd and 3rd pairing defensemen and you have two other lines with line drivers that can put pucks in the net.
Theres no shot in hell if they acquire Eichel that LaF or Panarin aren’t stapled to his left. He is a shooter, whereas Barkov is the more all around complete player. Eichel can pass too, not doubt about that but when he’s on top of his game he’s firing pucks at the net
The Rangers are most successful when they have good depth and can roll four lines that are all threats to score and are playing responsible two way hockey on all lines.Theres no shot in hell if they acquire Eichel that LaF or Panarin aren’t stapled to his left. He is a shooter, whereas Barkov is the more all around complete player. Eichel can pass too, not doubt about that but when he’s on top of his game he’s firing pucks at the net
If one goes back and looks at how much discontented young players in their prime were traded for, it's nowhere close to what's being thrown around here. Also considering Eichel has a $10 million cap hit, unless Buffalo retains 20-25%, they're not getting close to multiple 1st's AND blue chip prospects.
Buffalo is going to want some pieces for now and aren't going to go for a strictly futures package, IMO.
My best guess if Eichel is dealt to the Rangers? It happens at the draft or in the time between the draft and free agency this offseason.
Kravtsov is the headlining blue chip prospect, Chytil as the young NHL ready piece, and a decent LHD prospect akin to Robertson or Jones, and a conditional 2022 1st (becomes a 1st if Rangers make the playoffs in 2022, otherwise a 2nd rounder) for Eichel with no cap dollars retained and a depth Buffalo forward like Girgensons or Reider.
Zibanejad then gets dealt to a team looking for a shakeup like Calgary, Minnesota, Arizona, or Nashville for something close to a Marian Gaborik like return (young top 9 center that team soured on but still has promise (Brassard), a good bottom six forward (Dorsett), and a competent #4 or #5 defenseman (John Moore).
I like Calgary and Minnesota the most as Zibanejad trade targets all things considered between their likelihood to deal and having pieces that the Rangers would find desirable.
Buchnevich extended. Deangelo is traded somewhere for a reclamation project at a similar cap hit or is bought out.
It may make a lot of people upset, but that the end of the day, the Rangers are a better team moving forward and they keep all of their good, young players in Laf, Kakko, Fox, Miller, Lundkvist, Shestorkin, one of Robertson or Jones, and Schneider.
You're looking at this for 2021-22 opening night:
Kreider-Eichel-Kakko
Lafreniere-Trade-Buchnevich
Panarin-Strome-Trade
Girgensons/Reider-Howden-Blackwell
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Trouba
Trade-Lundkvist
Igor
Kinkaid/Vet Backup
Georgiev or Gauthier lost to expansion.
Panarin feasts on the bad matchups against 2nd and 3rd pairing defensemen and you have two other lines with line drivers that can put pucks in the net.
I mean, this line could have been stated and held true even as we were on the eve of our Stanley Cup run some years back lolThis team isn't NEARLY the clusterf*** that reading these boards would lead you to believe...
There’s no chance that happensWell Larry speculated that the trade conversation would start with Lafreniere
Im really doubtful Eichel gets to leave Buffalo.
Larry B. must be reading the board.
Mika Zibanejad’s disastrous decline raises Jack Eichel question for Rangers
https://nypost.com/2021/02/21/mika-zibanejads-rangers-decline-raises-jack-eichel-question/
What does that mean? If he says he wants out he's going to get dealt. You can't have a guy sitting for 6 years.
Honestly, they wouldn’t deal LaF. Kakko is the guy I think MIGHT have to be included. Honestly kakko,1st, prospect and some cash the other way prob gets it doneWell Larry speculated that the trade conversation would start with Lafreniere.
Granted, trading your just 1st OV pick for Eichel then giving him the captaincy would be a ballsy move,, but not one that I'm fully convinced wouldn't come back to bite NYR in the ass long term.
Gotta pair Eichel with a pass first player, like Panarin is and LaF projects to beThe Rangers are most successful when they have good depth and can roll four lines that are all threats to score and are playing responsible two way hockey on all lines.
I can see Lafreniere and Eichel gelling well, but not Panarin and Eichel. They're too similar and want the puck on their stick at all times. I'm tempted to say just switch Kakko and Lafreniere on my mocked up lines, but that means Lafreniere plays on the right side which I'm not sure works. I'm figuring Kreider and Kakko work best to open up space for Eichel to do his thing. Kakko is also a decent playmaker that can feed Eichel well.
The clock is def ticking. The stuff leaked they his agent in the summer. They have to deal him before his NMC kicks in, if not and he’s still disgruntled he’s really got buffalo by the balls and they know thatIm really doubtful Eichel gets to leave Buffalo.
He's smaller than Girardi. You can win with guys like Girardi too. But for how long? I'm not saying dump Lindgren any time soon, but he's not a good candidate for a longer term contract.He is not smallish. You win championships with players like Lindgren
I get it, but you'd think that Buffalo would want a center prospect back, who else is there other than Chytil?