E-Train
Registered User
Uncle Larry with some Joel Shermanesque hysterics. Push for a panic trade so they can slam it for years to come.
Chytil and Lundkvist will be studs guaranteed. Kravtsov I'm not too sure about. However, as a Ranger fan this is most likely the best package we can come up with without letting Laf, Kakko, Miller or Fox go.
I'm not a fan of trading all these assets for him either way. We are in need of a 1C but do we really want to gut our system? Tough decision to be had for sure.
Just only on the HF trade rumor section where every fan base expects to get multiple 1st round picks and multiple top prospects. But GM’s just don’t that. Joe Thornton didn’t get that, Eric Lindros didn’t get that.That's about what I'd give up for Eichel. I don't remember players like Kakko, Laf, or Miller ever being moved in trades.
Lol people already souring on Shesty?
Guy has a career 2.32 GAA & .928 SV%
He is the KHL record holder for basically every statistical category
He’s the only one of our top end prospects who’s lived up to the hype yet, maybe we were too spoiled with Lundqvist and take elite goaltending as a given, and some are pessimistic about the fact we didn’t win a cup with Hank.
Then at some point you loose him snd spend the next 5 years either paying a lot of dollars or a lot of assets in trying to replace him. Yeah, we need to see how he holds up, but players like him are is what holds defenses together.We can sign him above market value to two-year contracts for the rest of his career, I wouldn't mind at all; but he is just such a risky guy to tie up long term.
Trading Lundkvist would hurt. Chytil getting replaced by Eichel is a win. We have enough wing prospects.
Then at some point you loose him snd spend the next 5 years either paying a lot of dollars or a lot of assets in trying to replace him. Yeah, we need to see how he holds up, but players like him are is what holds defenses together.
Chytil, Buch, Lundkvist & a 1st. That should get it done. Not sure that I would make that trade, but that is a very realistic trade profile. The deal does not get done unless another center goes backChytil, Lundkvist,Kravtsov and a 1st for Eichel. Maybe another small add or pick, if they don’t like it then Buffalo can GTFO.
I think trading Chytil is a mistake.
Mika is not here beyond this contract so we would be w/o a 2nd line center which is exactly what Chytil is trending to be
That gives the Sabres 3 new players for next season and likely a first rounder to join them the following year and frees up 3-4 million they can offer towards a new Hall deal .....they might consider it . That also is a lot of youth to throw away in one deal for a team 2-3 years away from being a cup contender .....means we likely have a run at one cup like 94.....do people want to load up for one cup ?Chytil, Lundkvist,Kravtsov and a 1st for Eichel. Maybe another small add or pick, if they don’t like it then Buffalo can GTFO.
I agree. One of those offers should be a reasonable template for a trade. I’m not crazy to give up Chytil or Lundkvist but you gotta give to get. If they don’t like it, tell them to go find someone else.Chytil, Buch, Lundkvist & a 1st. That should get it done. Not sure that I would make that trade, but that is a very realistic trade profile. The deal does not get done unless another center goes back
And that’s completely fairWe don't need to commit to anything long term with him right now, so in a few years, we can make a
Though, I would definitely hope that we'd approach those negotiations with extra caution, given his style of play.
Eichel fits perfect with LaF or Panarin. He’s a shoot first young center whose young and signed long term. However, I’m wary to give up major assets for him because like Zibby, he only has 2 goals. His secondary assists are making him look better then he’s currently playing. I think Barkov is the more complete player and better fit for the team we are building, but getting Eichel would certainly be a coup. I think he may be suffering from a shoulder injury as well as low morale. I just want to make sure they don’t spend a ton of draft capital on damaged goods. I really hope Barkov goes to UFA lol
That team in 94 was much older than the team here now. Kravtsov is a question mark, Chytil hasn’t made himself untouchable yet. You got Fox and Trouba on D with Schneider behind them on that side. The draft this year is nothing spectacular.That gives the Sabres 3 new players for next season and the first rounder join on the following year and frees up 3-4 million they can offer Hall .....they might consider it . That also is a lot of youth to throw away in one deal for a team 2-3 years away from being a cup contender .....means we likely have a run at one cup like 94.....do people want to load up for one cup ?
Wait, wait. Chytil, Lundkvist, Kravstov, Buch AND 2 firsts? Yeah. No. Not even a little bit.There will need to be at least another first and probably Buch.
That does not make you in the minorityI may be in the minority... I do not give up any of those 5 for Jack Eichel.
Chytil, Buch, Lundkvist & a 1st. That should get it done. Not sure that I would make that trade, but that is a very realistic trade profile. The deal does not get done unless another center goes back
Wait, wait. Chytil, Lundkvist, Kravstov, Buch AND 2 firsts? Yeah. No. Not even a little bit.
If Mika is not here, how do you acquire a 1c will be the challenge without giving up significant pieces.
30+ million of cap space to three players is not a good thing and if you think Mika is making less than 8-9 per on his next deal, I have a surprise for you.
My offer for Eichel is Mika, CK or Buch, top 3 protected 1st in 21 and if necessary, Matt Robertson.
Beyond that, pass