Speculation: Roster Building Thread LXXXI - All along the Watch Tower

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Upscale version of Brendan Lemieux?

Something like that. A Lemieux who can win a face off and play 12-15 minutes? Maybe help the second PP unit? Maybe fit, or at least fill in, with Panarin when he needs a shakeup. Otherwise bring 12 minutes of energy and grit? Why not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
I didn’t say we lack it, I just said I like Bennett’s. I also don’t think we can expect Blackwell, Rooney, et al to maintain this level all year. There’s a reason they’re AHL/NHL tweeners at their ages. They’re running with the opportunity being given right now and in the perfect situation due to our age/depth and injuries. Bennett is much more of a ‘mainstay’ third line type than them, IMO, though I have been more than pleasantly surprised with them this year.


I just think that if we were willing to give grinders 2 plus mil a year we would have just re signed Fast
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBloodyNine
I just can’t imagine that this third year would somehow shoestring the Rangers in any meaningful way. Still unclear on the decision making there
Yep. Same here. Too good and versatile a player for that to be the deciding factor. Not that I am questioning that it was actually the deciding factor, just questioning the decision itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LokiDog
I want to point out that Eichel has as many goals as Mika. I know that Mika has a lot fewer assists but Eichel is a sub PPG player right now some of these trade proposals are crazy. Miller? Laf? Kakko? These aren't guys we are overrating as Rangers fans, all three have superstar potential. f*** that.
 
I want to point out that Eichel has as many goals as Mika. I know that Mika has a lot fewer assists but Eichel is a sub PPG player right now some of these trade proposals are crazy. Miller? Laf? Kakko? These aren't guys we are overrating as Rangers fans, all three have superstar potential. f*** that.

"But it's a strong division"
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
I want to point out that Eichel has as many goals as Mika. I know that Mika has a lot fewer assists but Eichel is a sub PPG player right now some of these trade proposals are crazy. Miller? Laf? Kakko? These aren't guys we are overrating as Rangers fans, all three have superstar potential. f*** that.

he has 13 points in 14 games so while technically true labeling him a sub PPG is a little bit misleading. and you do really that you aren't trading for a 24 year old for what he's done in the last 12 games right? the rangers aren't trading kakko or lafreniere for anyone, but the sabres will ask for them cause eichel is THAT good. 0.95 points per game in his career on a terrible team. 294 points in 287 games since his rookie year, lets not be silly and act like we shouldn't want him cause he isn't that good
 
he has 13 points in 14 games so while technically true labeling him a sub PPG is a little bit misleading. and you do really that you aren't trading for a 24 year old for what he's done in the last 12 games right? the rangers aren't trading kakko or lafreniere for anyone, but the sabres will ask for them cause eichel is THAT good. 0.95 points per game in his career on a terrible team. 294 points in 287 games since his rookie year, lets not be silly and act like we shouldn't want him cause he isn't that good

He's good but I'm not trading potential superstars for him. He's not McDavid, McKinnon, or even Matthews.
 
I want to point out that Eichel has as many goals as Mika. I know that Mika has a lot fewer assists but Eichel is a sub PPG player right now some of these trade proposals are crazy. Miller? Laf? Kakko? These aren't guys we are overrating as Rangers fans, all three have superstar potential. f*** that.

... And Eichel doesn’t have superstar potential? In fact, it’s quite a stretch to say that any of ours have “superstar” potential. All star potential? Sure. Super star? Like Kane, Matthews, MacKinnon? Maybe Laf. Eichel, on the other hand, is already a borderline superstar. Playing disgruntled for a terribly mismanaged team. I love the HF emphasis on “potential”. Eichel is 24 years old and has 350 points in 368 career games, including 82 points in 77 games and 78 points in 68 games the past two seasons, but we wouldn’t trade Kakko for him because he has “potential”. Potential to be more than a 90 point pacing 1C? Come on.
 
... And Eichel doesn’t have superstar potential? In fact, it’s quite a stretch to say that any of ours have “superstar” potential. All star potential? Sure. Super star? Like Kane, Matthews, MacKinnon? Maybe Laf. Eichel, on the other hand, is already a borderline superstar. Playing disgruntled for a terribly mismanaged team. I love the HF emphasis on “potential”. Eichel is 24 years old and has 350 points in 368 career games, including 82 points in 77 games and 78 points in 68 games the past two seasons, but we wouldn’t trade Kakko for him because he has “potential”. Potential to be more than a 90 point pacing 1C? Come on.

I'm not bailing out Buffalo, the idea is to add Eichel to the core, not to detract from the core to add him. And you're bringing up a 3 time cup winner and two top 3 or 4 players. You can be a superstar without being a top 5 player in the league.

I'm sure you'd be saying similar things with Mika played on a different team and was at a 60 goal pace last year. Now he's a shell of himself. I'd rather not mortgage the future. How many of those types of players work out for us?
 
I'm not bailing out Buffalo, the idea is to add Eichel to the core, not to detract from the core to add him. And you're bringing up a 3 time cup winner and two top 3 or 4 players. You can be a superstar without being a top 5 player in the league.

I'm sure you'd be saying similar things with Mika played on a different team and was at a 60 goal pace last year. Now he's a shell of himself. I'd rather not mortgage the future. How many of those types of players work out for us?

It’s a completely different scenario to acquire Eichel at this point in time. Three years ago no one had MacKinnon ranked like he is now. That’s exactly the type of player Eichel is. I’m not saying mortgage the future, but there are no untouchables for a guy like Eichel, and the closest thing to one would be Fox, just due to position. I mean after 78 points in 68 games as a 23 year old, and 82 in 77 as a 22 year old, you’re using a 14 game sample size this year (in which he still has 13 points) to compare him to Zib being “a shell of himself” after a career year at 27/28?
 
It’s a completely different scenario to acquire Eichel at this point in time. Two years ago no one had MacKinnon ranked like he is now. That’s exactly the type of player Eichel is. I’m not saying mortgage the future, but there are no untouchables for a guy like Eichel, and the closest thing to one would be Fox, just due to position. I mean after 78 points in 68 games as a 23 year old you’re using a 14 game sample size this year (in which he still has 13 points) to compare him to Zib being “a shell of himself” after a career year at 27/28?

MacKinnon has had a very unorthodox arc, no guarantee Eichel reaches it. In fact it's unlikely he does.
 
I want to point out that Eichel has as many goals as Mika. I know that Mika has a lot fewer assists but Eichel is a sub PPG player right now some of these trade proposals are crazy. Miller? Laf? Kakko? These aren't guys we are overrating as Rangers fans, all three have superstar potential. f*** that.
He's at PPG while shooting 4%, and his on-ice SH% is 3.86%. And he's been dominant in driving play. Guy is an elite player who is 24 and is locked in at a very reasonable rate through his prime. If you wouldn't give up Miller for Eichel I have to question that big time. The other two I would prefer not to but it would be a tough decision.
 
MacKinnon has had a very unorthodox arc, no guarantee Eichel reaches it. In fact it's unlikely he does.


But Eichel is already an 80+ point player. He had 82 in 77 as a 22 year old and 78 in 68 as a 23 year old. The start of Eichel’s career has been better than Mackinnon’s and they’re similar players in style. There’s absolutely nothing to suggest that playing on a better team where he’s happy for once he doesn’t have a peak that’s higher than what we’ve already seen. 78 in 68 last year is literally a 94 point pace at 23.
 
Through the first 5 years of their careers (Eichel is just starting his 6th):

MacKinnon: 303 points, 374 games, 66.4 per 82 pace, 114 goals

Eichel: 337 points, 354 games, 78 per 82 pace, 137 goals
 
Through the first 5 years of their careers (Eichel is just starting his 6th):

MacKinnon: 303 points, 374 games, 66.4 per 82 pace, 114 goals

Eichel: 337 points, 354 games, 78 per 82 pace, 137 goals

As I said MacKinnon had an unorthodox career. Started fairly well in his rookie season that had a couple of subpar seasons. Production in sports isn't necessarily linear.
 
As I said MacKinnon had an unorthodox career. Started fairly well in his rookie season that had a couple of subpar seasons. Production in sports isn't necessarily linear.

Right, but that doesn’t do anything to support Eichel being done developing or not continuing to develop relatively linearly, given the success he’s already had. You’re a finance and numbers guy. Would you bet your family’s savings on the number of times Eichel paces for 90+ points or Kakko paces for 70+?
 
I just can’t imagine that this third year would somehow shoestring the Rangers in any meaningful way. Still unclear on the decision making there
He also made comments about team-wide work ethic and what was expected of him as opposed to what was expected of his linemates/teammates. That seems like another problem, and it cost us one of our more dedicated players, who took less money to leave that environment.
 
Kakko has been a bit snakebit but I don't have any issue with him in our top 6 and I expect that eventually his production is going to pick up and reflect the progress his game has made since last season. Part of the issue is our centers need to pick up their respective games. It's a lot harder for most wingers (excepting Panarin) to produce a lot when their centers aren't playing well.
Maybe we can try this when Fil is back:
Bread. Mika. Laf.
Kreider . Strome. Buch
Gaut.PDG Fil. KK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad