Yea if you assume Zibanejad is signing for what, $9M in 2022, replacing that with Eichel's hit seems like a good trade. Now sure you could instead hope Barkov hits UFA or deal for him as a rental and give him the money instead.
The potential hold up I see for Eichel is, what is the NHL piece going back? DeAngelo might have fit this summer, that ship sailed. Including Chytil would be basically punting on any semblance of C depth yet again.
I would think it would take 4 pieces that hurt. Maybe more. So something like Chytil, Top 5-10 pick this year, Nils/Kravtsov, Robertson/Jones.
Lucking into signing Barkov for free would be the dream. We can let Mika walk with no hard feelings or sunken cost.
Extended Mika + for an extended Barkov could be a real conversation at next season's deadline. Just throwing that out there.
Getting Eichel for a package that doesn't include Laf or KK would be the 2nd best option.
Given that we're saying Laf and KK are untouchable in the deal, those pieces don't actually hurt that bad.
I think they really need a "1 or 2C type" in the deal, and we can't offer that without an extended Mika where he waives. If that happens, then cool.
I don't think Chytil (2 or 3C) does it for them. If it does, then cool.
A 1st, whether 21 or 22, protected or not, is assumed. Cool.
I happen to think that Lundkvist is tailor made to fit their team. We hold on to Schneider for the long haul. Very cool.
Kravtsov would be okay value for them, but Reinhart, Thompson, and Quinn are there to progress while Okposo lives out his contract.
If they see Reinhart as a C going forward, then Chytil and Kravtsov become that much more palatable, maybe?
They seem to have their own "Robertsons and Joneses," but the framework is there for a deal.