CLW
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2018
- 7,598
- 7,506
I’d understand the move if it makes sense but I put higher up then all those d you mentioned besides lundkvist. I would move any of them (again maybe not Lundkvist) before Miller if possible. On top of that I think Miller will be better than Lindgren when he’s Lindgrens age.
Yes, it's a matter of how you rate them. Personally I think Jones, given 3 years, may look a lot like Fox does today. That's huge and would be hard to trade for me. Lundkvist, if his game translates, also seems a rare talent. Schneider and Lindgren are needed because of physical play. Robertson may be good, but doesn't carry as much trade return potentially. That leaves Miller as the player with the most bang for the buck in return. Now this is just spitballing since we haven't seen many of the others in the NHL yet, but the rationale behind Miller being a potential trade pawn. An abundance of riches as I said, and not all can stay.