- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,931
- 22,855
I wish some of the beat writers would ask specifically about the LHD situation and what they expect out of Hajek/Reunenan/Robertson.
What sort of answer do you expect to get?
I wish some of the beat writers would ask specifically about the LHD situation and what they expect out of Hajek/Reunenan/Robertson.
I wish some of the beat writers would ask specifically about the LHD situation and what they expect out of Hajek/Reunenan/Robertson.
A few years ago I might have agreed with you. Now, I'm not as vested in sports as I was then.Well worth it. Especially if you follow more than one sport
Haha my thoughts exactly.
Haha my thoughts exactly.
yeah awesome, unproven prospect was best player for Finland. I will take 25 Year old Trouba every day of the week and twice on sunday for that pick. Cant wait for year two of Trouba.
The fact that you have to remind people who this prospect is below the tweet just shows how its irrelevance.
Heinola selected with the pick we sent to WPG for Trouba, FWIW.
The fact that you have to remind people who this prospect is below the tweet just shows how its irrelevance.
@KreiderBomb @GAGLine You know me better than that: What answer do I expect to get? I'll tell you how the question I would ask or would be intelligent to ask:
Reunanen: He's played very well in Europe and a lot of minutes as compared to some of the other guys. Do you see the game shape and age as an advantage? Would you be comfortable playing him in a top four spot? Where do you see his progression from draft day and do you expect him to have a camp as good as he did last year?
Hajek: He's had an uneven go the last year and change. What does he have to do to make this team? Where do you want his game to improve from even as recently as the bubble? Do you think the other competition is starting to made themselves heard and pushing him a little bit to the backburner?
Robertson: How had he improved since the draft? Are you comfortable with playing with other relatively young RHDs? Would you rather he stay on the taxi quad than AHL?
If they offer generic answers it's fine, but to at least give some thoughts on their overall game and improvement and what the expect out of them I don't think is very controversial.
Does @RangerBoy write for them?Even though I'm a freelance writer as my side gig, I rarely recommend people buy subs to pay sites. The Athletic, however, is absolutely worth it.
And should.![]()
It's not even about Trouba, they probably would've taken someone else with the pick and then we're still sitting here being like Heinola is better than ___, why did we pick ___ over Heinola??
Heinola is just a shit LundkvistThe fact that you have to remind people who this prospect is below the tweet just shows how its irrelevance.
Tweet was deleted, what did it say?
Ahh thanksI believe it was just about Zib, Richards and Kinkaid being day-to-day.
Nice list of players. But let's again remind the impatient among us that all will be inexperienced YOUNG defensemen who will make mistakes nd not be stars instantly.Serious questions out of--Prospect wise whom holds the most value ? Thinking out loud the list below should be close maybe Schneider over Reunanen with Robertson moving up fast.
Nils Lundkvist
K'Andre Miller
Tarmo Reunanen
Braden Schneider
Matthew Robertson
Zac Jones
Nice to think we have some very good young D-Man in the pipeline and the list doesn't even include ADA and Fox on the Rangers and Libor Hajek/ Rykov and a few others as most of these players are a cut below the top.
If the Rangers are looking to acquire a top player whom would you put on a package first to entice the other team ?
ADA with Nils replacing him. Or would most teams want Lundkvist because he would be cheaper. How about Miller big and a huge reach--he could/should turn into a top pairing D-Man.
Doesn't matter but it's great to know we have the ammo for a deal and the future looks very bright--hell we could even part with 2 players and still have a deep prospect pool with our D.