Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,070
- 40,920
Strome's weaknesses are why the organization is looking to replace him.
It's just that the opportunity didn't arise this offseason for a myriad of reasons, and keeping him around was a far preferable option to letting him go for nothing. My only beef is that we gave him 2 years instead of 1.
And replacing him is fine. But someone here was talking about simply not qualifying him and losing him for nothing in free agency. That's foolish