How about his lazy, undisciplined, entitled, one-dimensional playing style, for starters?Every word!
Don’t know what it is about Strome that made him so unlikable. I bet if he was a bit prettier like Brassard...
How about his lazy, undisciplined, entitled, one-dimensional playing style, for starters?Every word!
Don’t know what it is about Strome that made him so unlikable. I bet if he was a bit prettier like Brassard...
if he was as good as Brassard, for startersEvery word!
Don’t know what it is about Strome that made him so unlikable. I bet if he was a bit prettier like Brassard...
if he was as good as Brassard, for starters
That’s okay too. We are allowed to have different opinions.I guess we disagree there then. I can't believe we reached a point where people prefer a magic bean and the worst defenseman in the NHL over Ryan Strome and Jack Johnson.
if he was as good as Brassard, for starters
The Rangers aren’t trying to contend this year so use Chytil there and see if he can prove he can do it. You can also put Panarin with Zibanejad if that floats your boatand how are you replacing strome with no cap space?
I think that’s a plan but it never seems to be that easy.I think Gorton will recoup that 2nd round pick when he moves Strome.
Without Strome, we’re also forced to play Chytil in a role he very well might not be ready for. Howden is likely your 3C and Barron your 4C w/o Strome. Not a fan of that.
That 2nd round pick might be 3-4 years away from being an NHL player. Gorton 100% made the better choice here than keeping Staal and a 2nd and letting Strome walk.
I despise the JJ signing but it’s a 1 year contract and I feel he’ll be more of a #7 guy by the end of the season.
The Rangers aren’t trying to contend this year so use Chytil there and see if he can prove he can do it. You can also put Panarin with Zibanejad if that floats your boat
We are talking about Strome as if he is paid like Brassard was at the same stage in their careers. He isn't.
5.52% vs 7.25%
Strome isn't overpaid. He isn't blocking us from signing our FAs. There's a huge difference between knowing his limitations and flat out acting like he's a 4th liner
RE: Brass v Strome:
If Strome put up 5 points in that bubble series. I would then, maybe give him that comparison. Brass always had an extra level for us when the games got tougher.
The best thing about Strome is that he frees up Zibanejad to another line where he can elevate the level of his linemates.
Offensive balance is key. I dont remember any Pens fans angry that Pascal Dupuis was blocking Malkin from playing on Crosby's line.
Not with the same roster as last year they aren’t.i think they are trying to compete
Not with the same roster as last year they aren’t.
How many seasons do we have to play Strome before he learns defenseBrassard joined the Rangers with a similarly crappie resume too.
Why did Gaborik get a pass? Dude's stick didn't touch the ice on a neutral zone forecheck in his entire tenure.How about his lazy, undisciplined, entitled, one-dimensional playing style, for starters?
Why did Gaborik get a pass? Dude's stick didn't touch the ice on a neutral zone forecheck in his entire tenure.
I mean in reality he didn't. Only with the superficial fanboys. Torts was not cised. Used to humiliate him in practice all the time.He shouldn’t... but the likely reasons are a)he was by far our best offensive player at the time, and we didn’t have Zib or Panarin at time. Plus we weren’t growing our own players so there was desperation for offensive talent.
Why did Gaborik get a pass? Dude's stick didn't touch the ice on a neutral zone forecheck in his entire tenure.
He was supplanted by Dubinsky. Maybe that's how?There’s more than just offense. The rest of his game is atrocious. Why do I want an offense only player who isn’t super cheap and needs a superstar to boost his production to an adequate level? Minimal sample but Chytil performed better with Panarin last year anyway. Not enough to take anything from of course but I know for certain if Chyil had 0 points in 100 minutes with Panarin it would be used to the contrary.
And it’s already happened. Anisimov scored 45 in 64 games with Panarin in 16–17. By far the best year of his career offensively. I've already illustrated this numerous times in the past with Crosby as an example. Every wing to ever play a decent amount of time with him has scored at a first line level rate and we're talking about guys ranging from like Phil Kessel to Dominik Simon.
------------------
Same for the whole Nylander/Jagr/Gomez thing. It's not true. Gomez had a great year with Jagr. Jagr's decline wasn't a function of playing with Gomez. His second year with Nylander, compared to his first year with Nylander, was just as much of a falloff as his first year with Gomez, compared to his second year with Nylander. Gomez and Jagr has a 62.5 CF%, 61.8 GF%, 60.7 xGF% in 514 minutes in 07-08. It was one of the best lines in the league. I don't understand how this narrative always gets perpetuated.
Not with the same roster as last year they aren’t.