will1066
If you score four, you better f'n win the game
- Oct 12, 2008
- 52,413
- 75,531
Holland woke up from his nap?
You can't have a pool party in a storm surge.
Last edited:
Holland woke up from his nap?
Drury isn't the problem.....it's the idiot owner that worries me.Remember one thing: Drury grew up as a fan of this team so he is no doubt aware of the patterns in our past. I trust him.
Rangers beating him in the Cup Final would be the best thing. Ratings would be high for that Finals.I wouldn't mind Chychrun going to Edmonton. The longer McDavid is in the playoffs, the better for the league.
Granted, this might last all of 5 shifts like the Panarin-Tarasenko marriage lasted. But initial reports are Panarin and Kane playing alongside Trocheck.
Duly corrected.IMO this is different from stuff of the past because drury clearly isn't all in on just going for big names (last year he didn't) and isn't selling the farm to do it. He wasn't even going to go for Kane until DOLAN THOUGHT the offer was too good to pass up
Cal Foote is terrible. Stuck out like a sore thumb every time the Rangers played Tampa and he was in the lineup.
Tarasenko is kinda the odd ball out. He's a shooter who goes into traffic and needs a playmaker, which neither Zibanejad and Kreider truly is.
Breaking up the Kid Line right now might be tough, but I think "fit wise" Kakko can play with Mika and Kreider, and Tarasenko could play with Laf and Chytil.Zibanejad can be. Maybe Tarasenko should play with Lafreniere.
Oh yeah, I'm not worried about that pickup - he's more of the same for them. He's a corsi merchant basically. Good player to have in your bottom six but he's more of the same for them.You forgot "cant score". He'll fit right in when they outshoot teams 40-25 on the road and lose 4-1
This is what I’d do if we’re forcing Panarin and Kane together.Breaking up the Kid Line right now might be tough, but I think "fit wise" Kakko can play with Mika and Kreider, and Tarasenko could play with Laf and Chytil.
So with the 2nds that went to Arizona we won't have a 2nd rounder until 2099 but I guess it's not a first or a Cuylle or a Sykora/Berard. So 2024 and 2027 2nd? or 2023 and 2024 2nd?Staple’s projection on Kane package is a pair of 2nd round picks and a 5th to the brokering team based on info he’s heard. That’s from his just released podcast. Not what it’s 100% going to be, just his own guess based on his reporting.
????So sad
What a JOKE
So sad
What?This is us
Same. You try to create a middle six that can matchup against bottom pairs and outscore their defensive lapses (Igor willing), and you have a first and fourth line that handle the checking assignments (and are talented enough to score too).This is what I’d do if we’re forcing Panarin and Kane together.
I am thoroughly enjoying you’re unnecessary meltdown.What a JOKE
Meltdown? What did I miss?I am thoroughly enjoying you’re unnecessary meltdown.
I honestly don't really buy that line, feels like a tired retread any beat writer can trot out to generate some more clicksDuly corrected.
That would be great if no prospects are included as well.Staple’s projection on Kane package is a pair of 2nd round picks and a 5th to the brokering team based on info he’s heard. That’s from his just released podcast. Not what it’s 100% going to be, just his own guess based on his reporting.