Continue.
Fair point sir.I have to wonder aloud if this is really the best course of action
Thirty One said:You present a strong argument, and I am no longer worried the Rangers won't be able to fill the physical space Kreider occupies.
I will find you.So is Bobby Mac clickbait?
So Bobby Mac is saying what a few of us have said...if Kreider stays, some combo of Buchnevich, Strome and/or DeAngelo gets moved. I’m fine moving Buchnevich and Strome to keep Kreider. DeAngelo? Not so much.
So Bobby Mac is saying what a few of us have said...if Kreider stays, some combo of Buchnevich, Strome and/or DeAngelo gets moved. I’m fine moving Buchnevich and Strome to keep Kreider. DeAngelo? Not so much.
Capitalize on Strome now. He is what he is. He has produced a bit above his norm and we all know that is a product of playing with Panarin. So in essence it shows an interested team that he is capable of playing with a premium player. Capitalize.
Don't you think other GMs know that Strome is a product of Panarin.
How about: if Strome was on the wild, he would be on pace for the highest scoring season for a center at a whooping 68 pts. Boy, the illustrious history of Wild hockey. Deal?Minnesota wants a 1C for Dumba/Brodin, or a 2C with a decent +. Any chance we could do a major sales job and sell them Strome as a 2C?![]()
Is Brodin really much of an upgrade on Skjei? I think ADA still shifts to LD, but I don't see acquiring Dumba behind Trouba and Fox. I don't think its a good fit.Minnesota wants a 1C for Dumba/Brodin, or a 2C with a decent +. Any chance we could do a major sales job and sell them Strome as a 2C?![]()
You have a better chance of winning Powerball.What are the chances that the Avalanche get so desperate that they trade Byram for Kreider?
You have a better chance of winning Powerball.