you are brave to venture there.Said it in the main board thread, he seemed like the most solid out the three this year.
Rittich is only good as a backup. The less he plays, the better he is.BIG DICK RITTICH!
Bring up Portillo. If they still want to slow cook Portillo in the AHL, get Rittich a solid partner to rotate with without one of them burning out. Brossoit, Stolarz, Samsonov. Brossoit might be in the lead because he's got the French last name.
This is what I'm thinking. Rittich is a decent #2 but could be a great #3. I think Copley will resign cheap to be the #3 fighting for #2 with Rittich. We just need to find a #1. I say look for a trade first and if not go after someone like Lankinen to hold the net until Portillo is ready.Stop talking about Brossoit like he is the answer. The guy plays 20 games a year in sheltered matchups. The one time he was ever asked to carry the load, in Vegas a couple years back, he totally cratered. Blake is stupid as shit and might actually sign the guy to a Petersen contract if he thinks that will score points with the fanbase that wants his head on a pike.
We still need a starting goalie. Talbot is not it. He is basically Brossoit at this point, maybe 25 games a year before the wheels fall off.
So we have a low-end but totally serviceable No.2 in Big Sieve Dave. We have a promising No. 3 in Portillo. You could always sign Copley to a league minimum.
But none of the above are going to move the needle at all from the bad spot we are currently stuck in.
I really just see them re-signing Talbot and calling it good in keeping with the "everything is fine, run it back" philosophy the French guys who are running the team into the ground seem to follow.
Nobody thinks that Brossoit is the answer. I think most fans just acknowledge that the Kings have a Blake tax and thus any smart moves with long term benefit are off the table. Brossoit is probably better than Talbot and simply the least-bad option that stays within the realm of possibilities that this front office would consider.Stop talking about Brossoit like he is the answer. The guy plays 20 games a year in sheltered matchups. The one time he was ever asked to carry the load, in Vegas a couple years back, he totally cratered. Blake is stupid as shit and might actually sign the guy to a Petersen contract if he thinks that will score points with the fanbase that wants his head on a pike.
We still need a starting goalie. Talbot is not it. He is basically Brossoit at this point, maybe 25 games a year before the wheels fall off.
So we have a low-end but totally serviceable No.2 in Big Sieve Dave. We have a promising No. 3 in Portillo. You could always sign Copley to a league minimum.
But none of the above are going to move the needle at all from the bad spot we are currently stuck in.
I really just see them re-signing Talbot and calling it good in keeping with the "everything is fine, run it back" philosophy the French guys who are running the team into the ground seem to follow.
You would think, but knowing Blake, after he gives himself an extension he'll sign Talbot to an 8-year $6.5M AAV deal.This mean Talbots gone?
Rittich is only good as a backup. The less he plays, the better he is.
Portillo will be 24. I can't imagine him not in the mix next season.Talbot seemed to love it here, wouldn't be surprised to see him, Rittich, Copley all in the mix
Stop talking about Brossoit like he is the answer. The guy plays 20 games a year in sheltered matchups. The one time he was ever asked to carry the load, in Vegas a couple years back, he totally cratered. Blake is stupid as shit and might actually sign the guy to a Petersen contract if he thinks that will score points with the fanbase that wants his head on a pike.
We still need a starting goalie. Talbot is not it. He is basically Brossoit at this point, maybe 25 games a year before the wheels fall off.
So we have a low-end but totally serviceable No.2 in Big Sieve Dave. We have a promising No. 3 in Portillo. You could always sign Copley to a league minimum.
But none of the above are going to move the needle at all from the bad spot we are currently stuck in.
I really just see them re-signing Talbot and calling it good in keeping with the "everything is fine, run it back" philosophy the French guys who are running the team into the ground seem to follow.
Apologies if I wasn’t clear on my post. No, I don’t think Brossoit is the answer to our goaltending and for him to be our starter. Unless we trade for a bonafide starter, I believe that Brossoit or the other Gs I named are options for Rittich to split time with if we don’t re-sign Talbot and decide not to bring Portillo up.Nobody thinks that Brossoit is the answer. I think most fans just acknowledge that the Kings have a Blake tax and thus any smart moves with long term benefit are off the table. Brossoit is probably better than Talbot and simply the least-bad option that stays within the realm of possibilities that this front office would consider.
That's what concerns me. They are going to just run the whole thing back again, keep nodding and smiling and saying how great the progress is. Wouldnt you if you had cap f***ed yourself into irrelevance and had no instructions on how to exit? We all saw how great the season turned out with three No.2 goalies as our crease.Talbot seemed to love it here, wouldn't be surprised to see him, Rittich, Copley all in the mix