Proposal: Rickard Rakell To Ottawa
- Thread starter Uchiha
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
Not interested in trading someone who had top 6 offensive numbers for someone with 3rd line offensive numbers. We need more offense not less.
edguy
Registered User
Not interested from an Ottawa POV. we already dont Have a 2nd. No way GMPD moves our first.
Plus cant imagine management giving up on Lazar when his path so far is very similar to guys like Fisher and Kesler, hes only 21, people take his numbers too seriously
Plus cant imagine management giving up on Lazar when his path so far is very similar to guys like Fisher and Kesler, hes only 21, people take his numbers too seriously
I agree. If Lazar's value is so low that the Sens need to include a 1st, he's gotta be more valuable on the team.
rt
Clean Hits on Substack
Definitely take the picks out and re-examin. I think a '17 3rd or '18 2nd from OTT and no pick from ANA is more appropriate than the OP.
dracom
Registered User
Vincenzo Areliti
Registered User
- May 6, 2016
- 79
- 5
edguy
Registered User
Too much from Ottawa. I dont think id do Lazar for Rakell 1 for 1. Lazar is so under rated.
Uchiha
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2014
- 2,612
- 289
Rakell is far superior to Lazar.
One-for-one would be absolute robbery for the Sens.
With a 1st accompanying Lazar? Sens would probably pass.
edguy
Registered User
Rakell seems very Similar stat wise to Rieder (like 5 point difference) and we can get Rieder one for one for Lazar from Yotes fans. So i dont see the point in adding to get Rackell when we can get Rieder one for one
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,320
- 10,281
anezthes
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2014
- 5,060
- 3,705
Don't think Ottawa will be bad enough next year to make it worth it for ANA.
It's not.
Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
- Jun 10, 2011
- 35,814
- 10,357
We really can't afford to give away any first round picks. And we have a ton of righties at forward. he's a nice palyer, but he doesn't really do anything to help Ottawa.
BondraTime
Registered User
Would love Rakell, loved him since his Plymouth days.
I'd give Lazar up in a second for him, not sure about giving up a 1st though, that would sting.
I'd give Lazar up in a second for him, not sure about giving up a 1st though, that would sting.
6 points difference in 10 less games.
Rakell had 0.614 ppg while Rieder had 0.451 ppg. Lazar had 0.263 ppg.
Rakell had 0.286 goals per game (he has hit 20 goals while Rieder never crossed 15), Rieder had 0.171 gpg. Lazar had 0.079 gpg.
Rieder and Rackell are not comparable.
Last edited:
Xspyrit
DJ Dorion
Not interested in moving the 1st. Ottawa has well enough offensive depth, no need to do that at all, and to add salary in the process, money that could be saved for later for re-signing core players
rt
Clean Hits on Substack
Ya I echo the Sens fans thoughts here. No one is more open to trading Lazar than me (not that he's a bad player at all, I just don't see much upside from where he is today) but adding a 1st for Rakell is too much, particularly since the Sens may very well be picking in the bottom 15.
rhinoshawarma
Registered User
- Nov 15, 2014
- 2,622
- 314
Vipers31
Advanced Stagnostic
Rakell's creativity and skill is something the Ducks have far less of a surplus of than responsible two-way guys. Lazar isn't too intriguing, so that's a definite pass.
