Drugstorecowboi
Registered User
- May 5, 2009
- 3,664
- 17
It's hard to move Tavares for sure, but no amount of skirting other issues which really aren't that bad takes away from the fact that we are doing it bc he is the problem.I think Tavares has an NMC, and it would be hard to imagine the Leafs asking him to waive it. He's probably here until the end of his contract.
Since I'm just a fan -- and not management -- I'm allowed to play favorites. I really like John Tavares and I can't stand Evander Kane. Kane is much better than Tavares on the ice, but I don't think I would get too wound up cheering for him.
To each his own.
SOme good choices in here. Dubas has unfortunately ruined his flexibility even beyond the top 4 forward issue.There's a pile of guys round the league that could help our bottom 6.
Long-shots, but should be cheap:
Max Jones, Wade Allison, Mackenzie Entwistle, Eetu Tuulola
Solid bottom-6 guys:
Auston Watson, Christian Fischer, Keegan Kolesar, Nathan Bastian
Middle-6 guys:
Max Comtois, Nicolas Roy, Lawson Crouse, Jordan Greenway, Pavel Zacha, Miles Wood, Yakov Trenin
Nylander has been the best of the bunch the last three post seasons. Moving off a 6.9aav ppg guy who takes it up a notch in the post season isn’t the way to get playoff success.id be shocked if they looked to move marner but i get what you are saying. I think though you start with nylander and kerfoot. nylander is not a playoff guy and plays with no force. We need to start there. Lets see if Dubas has any balls
Look at the whole picture besides points. He was the worst of the four when it came to the complete gameNylander has been the best of the bunch the last three post seasons. Moving off a 6.9aav ppg guy who takes it up a notch in the post season isn’t the way to get playoff success.
Was he tho?Look at the whole picture besides points. He was the worst of the four when it came to the complete game
Look at the whole picture besides points. He was the worst of the four when it came to the complete game
This is creative, I like it.If we run it back let's do something drastic. JT on Matthews wing Nylander and Marner with a FA centre. Yes Matthews won't score 70 goals and yes Mitch might not break 100 points, but it gives the team 2 legit 1st lines and you really do have to pick your poison.
Will obviously never happen as Marner and Matthews are tied to the hip, but it would be nice for Keefe or whoever the new coach will/should be to actually experiment more with having your two best players drive their own line (like other teams who have done far more then we have in the playoffs have done). Especially when the team has pieces like JT and Nylander to play with as well.
JT MillerSo what sub $7M player do you bring in that will have a more complete game than Matthews, Marner and Tavares (All players making 8 figure salaries by the way)
No he hasn’t. There’s plenty of cap to move around. You can make 20m in cap space by shuffling out/not extending mrazek Campbell Holl muzzin kerfoot Kase mikheyev. You have internal replacements on the back end ready to go in Sandin and liljegren who might take 1-2m in raises from that pool, and you have to expect one of Steeves Anderson Robertson Abruessezze or someone else is ready to make a jump and steal a spot on the team at some point. So that leaves 17m for the goalie situation and some scoring depth.SOme good choices in here. Dubas has unfortunately ruined his flexibility even beyond the top 4 forward issue.
Didn't have to play there best hockey or was unable to play like they want to? If youre still thinking toronto was too soft this season, your clearly didn't watch the same serie of me. Its not because they lost than you are too soft.
Too win in playoff
-you need to play hard : they did it
-You need your goalie giving you a shot to win: campbell did it
-You need to be ready to pay the price and go on traffic, blocking shot, getting hit, playing hurt and whatever : they did it
-And during a serie flip coin, you need luck too: they dont get him at all
Ghost Call on kampf game #6 change everything. If they dont call it, the way leafs was playing... probably this serie is over in 6.
Call on tavares for interence but uncall the same kind of thing on paul 2nd goal and puck bouncing : matthews of spezza deflected the puck 2 inches short of the net...
Toronto did everything they need to win this series but still loose. It was happening when maybe the best 2 team in eastern playing against each other round 1. Im pretty sure if leafs was playing any other eastern team playing the same exact way they did, they would be in round 2, and i dont have any doubt about it.
It was a combination of both - us trying to go to the net more certainly made it harder for Vasilevakiy. We didn’t do anything to make Kucherov not work hard and just float around.
They played a hard as they could and it wasn’t good enough… because they were too weak and soft. That’s part of the reason we took so many penalties - players that didn’t really know how to play physical hockey were trying to force it.
You absolutely run it back. Maybe you tinker with the core at absolute most.
The Leafs got zero goals from a forward not named Matthews, Tavares or Nylander in games 4-7. The core showed up. Nobody else did.
No he hasn’t. There’s plenty of cap to move around. You can make 20m in cap space by shuffling out/not extending mrazek Campbell Holl muzzin kerfoot Kase mikheyev. You have internal replacements on the back end ready to go in Sandin and liljegren who might take 1-2m in raises from that pool, and you have to expect one of Steeves Anderson Robertson Abruessezze or someone else is ready to make a jump and steal a spot on the team at some point. So that leaves 17m for the goalie situation and some scoring depth.
This is a recording.It was a combination of both - us trying to go to the net more certainly made it harder for Vasilevakiy. We didn’t do anything to make Kucherov not work hard and just float around.
They played a hard as they could and it wasn’t good enough… because they were too weak and soft. That’s part of the reason we took so many penalties - players that didn’t really know how to play physical hockey were trying to force it.
It was a combination of both - us trying to go to the net more certainly made it harder for Vasilevakiy. We didn’t do anything to make Kucherov not work hard and just float around.
They played a hard as they could and it wasn’t good enough… because they were too weak and soft. That’s part of the reason we took so many penalties - players that didn’t really know how to play physical hockey were trying to force it.
This is a recording.
Kucherov was trash outside of the powerplay
Your opinion on why it wasn't enough is laughable.
We were the tougher team, I saw Tampa as the weak team.
I’ve been saying Kucherov was bad all series. He didn’t even try. Toronto didn’t make that happen is my point. It was a gift that they failed to capitalize on.
Guys like Kerfoot and Blackwell tried to play hard but they were just too weak to accomplish much physically. 5’9” vs 6’4” is a tough road to take…
That’s simply not true. The Leafs had been playing a physical brand most games since before the trade deadline and penalties were nowhere close to the issue they became in the first round. It didn’t seem like anything was being forced at all. Hell most of the penalties were stick infractions. The weak and soft narrative continues to be horsecrap
Rielly scored, but I count him as part of the core anyway. Those guys make up 60% of the cap next year, so it their offence isn’t enough, we’re in trouble.
Don't know what to tell you, watch better.That’s simply not true. The Leafs had been playing a physical brand most games since before the trade deadline and penalties were nowhere close to the issue they became in the first round. It didn’t seem like anything was being forced at all. Hell most of the penalties were stick infractions. The weak and soft narrative continues to be horsecrap
And yet it’s still not true
Why would someone not try?
Isn't Tampa smaller than the Leafs? At most they are similar size, so ya, not sure what that has to do with anything.
Also, refs said no to rough stuff starting game one.
Don't know what to tell you, watch better.
Sure they played somewhat more aggressive this year than prior years but not enough, too many passengers.