Mad...not mad...
I'ts just funny RDS called themselves "experts" when half of them don't know more than you and me.
Come again? We were bigger underdogs against them in 2002 and in 2004 - I cite these two series because we won both.
The Canadiens are a different team since acquiring Vanek.
I realized most 'experts' in Montreal are predicting Boston in 7 so they can cover their ass if the habs win, they could say I predict it to be very close anyway and it could go either way.
Of course the Habs are underdogs. They should be. If the Bruins win, so be it. They won't always win. I'm more concerned about the past and present chronic losers who are loading up on top draft choices and could create a dynasty before the Habs are able to reach the top.
Post of the day. NHL must change the draft system. Too many teams are winning cups due to 2 or more years of tanking. You get a McDavid, and you are half way there.
I remember 2002
Doesn't anyone else ?
Most of them have been in the NHL at one point or another and that alone makes them more knowledgeable than you or i.