Nah, I just know the petty folk who need to have the last word because they feel it somehow signals their victory.
In summary, you argued that the Leafs's first round woes aren't a current problem, and when it was pointed out that there's no more current example to disprove this, you ran away from that argument. Then you suggested that betting odds implicated the Leafs would be very successful, even though last year the Top 5 teams in betting odds all bailed out in the first round. So when that argument failed, you foolishly tried to argue over the definition of implicated. When that definition got posted, you bailed on that argument. And now, you're claiming to be "Done" while arguing the definition of done, all because you want to have the last word.
For someone so good at quitting on every failed argument he's had, you sure are bad at just quitting replying altogether.
Like I said a long time ago, you're a winner in the hearts of your Toronto brethren. Not so much with the rest of the logical hockey world. But hey, if having the last word makes you feel better about yourself, have at it.