Toggle sidebar

Rangers Prospect Ranking: (Winter 2024) - #15

#15

  • Victor Mancini (D)

    Votes: 1 2.3%

  • Ryder Korczak (F)

    Votes: 12 27.9%

  • Brody Lamb (F)

    Votes: 14 32.6%

  • Brandon Scanlin (D)

    Votes: 14 32.6%

  • Karl Henriksson (F)

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
The Crypto Guy

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
29,113
38,674
Rangers Winter 2024 Prospect Ranking

1. Gabe Perreault (F)
2. Brennan Othmann (F)
3. Will Cuylle (F)
4. Adam Sykora (F)
5. Brett Berard (F)
6. Dylan Garand (G)
7. Zac Jones (D)
8. Adam Edström (F)
9. Drew Fortescue (D)
10. Jaroslav Chmelar (F)
11. Bryce McConnell-Barker (F)
12. Noah Laba (F)
13. Matthew Robertson (D)
14. Matt Rempe (F)



36ba05788a5a181b0c8ceec921f217e0a2a3d9d6951c9d81bd63c612929ad297.jpg




Added: Victor Mancini
Please tell me who you want added!


​
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Name[/TD]
[TD]Pos.[/TD]
[TD]DOB[/TD]
[TD]Ht.[/TD]
[TD]Wt.[/TD]
[TD]Team/League[/TD]
[TD]Acquired[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Barbashev, Maxim[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]

[TD]
12/18/03​
[/TD]

[TD]6'1"[/TD]

[TD]
187​
[/TD]

[TD]Rimouski Océanic/QMJHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #161 2022[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Boyko, Talyn[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]

[TD]
10/16/02​
[/TD]

[TD]6'8"[/TD]

[TD]
200​
[/TD]

[TD]Cincinnati Cyclones/ECHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R4 #112 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Henricks, Ty[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]

[TD]
06/28/05​
[/TD]

[TD]6'5"[/TD]

[TD]
205​
[/TD]

[TD]Muskegon Lumberjacks/USHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #183 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Karpa, Zakary[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]

[TD]
03/25/02​
[/TD]

[TD]6'2"[/TD]

[TD]
190​
[/TD]

[TD]Harvard Crimson/ECAC[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #191 2022[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kempf, Hank[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]

[TD]
04/15/02​
[/TD]

[TD]6'2"[/TD]

[TD]
204​
[/TD]

[TD]Cornell Big Red/ECAC[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R7 #208 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Larsson, Rasmus[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]

[TD]
02/09/04​
[/TD]

[TD]6'3"[/TD]

[TD]
198​
[/TD]

[TD]Green Bay Gamblers/USHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #152 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lindbom, Olof[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]

[TD]
07/23/00​
[/TD]

[TD]6'2"[/TD]

[TD]
183​
[/TD]

[TD]Cincinnati Cyclones/ECHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R2 #39 2018[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Ollas, Hugo[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]

[TD]
04/24/02​
[/TD]

[TD]6'8"[/TD]

[TD]
253​
[/TD]

[TD]Merrimack Warriors/HEA[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R7 #197 2020[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Pajuniemi, Lauri[/TD]
[TD]RW[/TD]

[TD]
09/12/99​
[/TD]

[TD]6'0"[/TD]

[TD]
196​
[/TD]

[TD]IF Malmö Redhawks/SHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #132 2018[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Roobroeck, Dylan[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]

[TD]
07/27/04​
[/TD]

[TD]6'7"[/TD]

[TD]
204​
[/TD]

[TD]Oshawa Generals/OHL[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #178 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tärnström, Oliver[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]

[TD]
08/30/02​
[/TD]

[TD]6'0"[/TD]

[TD]
163​
[/TD]

[TD]Brynäs IF/HockeyAllsvenskan[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R3 #92 2020[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Trivigno, Bobby[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]

[TD]
01/19/99​
[/TD]

[TD]5'7"[/TD]

[TD]
160​
[/TD]

[TD]Hartford Wolf Pack/AHL[/TD]
[TD]Signed as UDFA 2022[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Väisänen, Kalle[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]

[TD]
01/28/03​
[/TD]

[TD]6'4"[/TD]

[TD]
203​
[/TD]

[TD]HC TPS/Liiga[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R4 #106 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to read more...
 
Have to cut down the result details since it won't let me post with too much stuff anymore. Womp.
 
Went with Lamb. add Väisänen.

We reached the point where it's long-shot prospects and IMO it's better to vote for pure upside than anything else because of the low probability of any of them making it.
 
Finally Rempe! Yayyy!
But they stupidly sent him down yesterday!?! Bbbooooooooooooo!!!!

Scanlin
he will push out of camp and likely need a little mo marinating, but getting ballpark close

Add Roo
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangersFan1994
Amazing Kreiderman said:
We reached the point where it's long-shot prospects and IMO it's better to vote for pure upside than anything else because of the low probability of any of them making it.
Click to expand...
I disagree, but that's the fun with prospect polls. I think sometimes older prospects get punished because they don't have Top-6 F or Top-4 D upside.

I went with Scanlin. The kid has continued to take a larger role and get better in his second year as a pro. He has all the tools and a pro frame. He could probably step in right now, if we needed him to. He'll never be anything more than a steady bottom-pair defender, but having those kinds of players waiting in the wings brings tremendous organizational value. Successful teams seem to be able to plug and play those types constantly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranger Ric
Voted for Scanlin add Roobroeck

bernmeister said:
Finally Rempe! Yayyy!
But they stupidly sent him down yesterday!?! Bbbooooooooooooo!!!!

Scanlin
he will push out of camp and likely need a little mo marinating, but getting ballpark close

Add Roo
Click to expand...



I like Scanlin but the fact they have not called him up to play a game or 2 by now, does worry me. Same with Robertson, their time is running out.
 
RangersFan1994 said:
Why was Harpur and Mackey given time over Scanlin including last season. That is telling
Click to expand...
It could be because the team is not high on Scanlin or Harpur and Mackey are veterans who have NHL experience or because Harpur and Mackay were serving as 7th D and it didn't make sense to take Scanlin out of the lineup and have him sit with the Rangers.

During the preseason he did not get into a game but he was scheduled to play in two games. He was listed as playing in the game in Boston. Because I am out of market I had the Boston feed on the NHL Network. The Boston announcers were talking during the game I think about Schneider and mentioned he was a late addition because of a scratch, which I presume was Scanlin. He also was penciled into the lineup to play the game that was postponed because of the rain storm.

I think those of us who have watched the Pack this year would agree that Scanlin has been a rock on defense and more impressive than Robertson. Scanlin is not waiver exempt next year so if he doesn't make the team he could be lost as was Emberson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eco's bones, Clark Kellogg and Beer League Sniper
RangersFan1994 said:
Why was Harpur and Mackey given time over Scanlin including last season. That is telling
Click to expand...
It could be because the team is not high on him or because the team was more comfortable bringing up Harpur and Mackay who both have NHL experience or because Harpur and Mackay were serving as 7th defensemen and unlikely to play and it made sense to keep Scanlin with the Pact and let him play.

I think that others who have watched the Pack this year would agree that Scanlin has been a rock on defense and more consistent and impressive than Robertson. But Robertson has had a few call ups while Scanlin has not.

Scanlin add Roobroeck with Ollas next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kovazub94
Ranger Ric said:
It could be because the team is not high on Scanlin or Harpur and Mackey are veterans who have NHL experience or because Harpur and Mackay were serving as 7th D and it didn't make sense to take Scanlin out of the lineup and have him sit with the Rangers.

During the preseason he did not get into a game but he was scheduled to play in two games. He was listed as playing in the game in Boston. Because I am out of market I had the Boston feed on the NHL Network. The Boston announcers were talking during the game I think about Schneider and mentioned he was a late addition because of a scratch, which I presume was Scanlin. He also was penciled into the lineup to play the game that was postponed because of the rain storm.

I think those of us who have watched the Pack this year would agree that Scanlin has been a rock on defense and more impressive than Robertson. Scanlin is not waiver exempt next year so if he doesn't make the team he could be lost as was Emberson.
Click to expand...
And no sooner than we had this discussion that the Rangers make this announcement, which would indicate some interest in the player.

www.nhl.com

Rangers Agree to Terms with Brandon Scanlin | New York Rangers

New York Rangers President and General Manager Chris Drury announced today that the team has agreed to terms with defenseman Brandon Scanlin on a two-year contract extension. Scanlin, 24, has registered seven goals and seven assists for 14 points in 43 games with the Hartford Wolf Pack of the...
www.nhl.com www.nhl.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: kovazub94
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom