Proposal: Rangers/Panthers
- Thread starter LiveLongandProspal
- Start date
Everything is fine
Registered User
- Apr 3, 2016
- 502
- 7
Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
- Sep 1, 2010
- 9,986
- 7,930
like with the Mike Stone topics, its a weird year,
at least Pysyk will be RFA, but the expansion draft is a complication
but if FP included a 2d, it could be tempting
especially this morning, after Klein drifted from the slot to allow the the Sens' 1-0 goal ...
at least Pysyk will be RFA, but the expansion draft is a complication
but if FP included a 2d, it could be tempting
especially this morning, after Klein drifted from the slot to allow the the Sens' 1-0 goal ...
SufferingCatFan
Registered User
In a word, yes. Right now, he is a legitimate top 4 and likely candidate to be protected in the expansion draft with Demers being exposed.
ZiGOODejad
intangibles
- Nov 30, 2013
- 5,372
- 1,563
didn't you just sign demers? was the intent to sign him then make him available for the expansion draft
Wtf? No. Tallon is still part of decisions and has spoken on Gallant's firing. Jagr loves playing with Barkov and Huberdeau.
He's not playing as well as Pysyk. It'll be interesting to see who gets exposed and who doesn't.
I could see the changes losing Jagr's interest especially if he's bumped down the line.. there is a potential for alot of turmoil in the locker room with significant divide among players.. see how Rowe handles it
FrolikFan67
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2012
- 7,369
- 4,137
would jagr himself be less committed to us? no. but this is pretty much his last seasons with us anyways and he hasn't looked great (granted thats probably due to no huberdeau on that line because even barkov hasn't been producing as much), id definitely be willing to trade him depending on the offer.
_____________
for pysyk, he's been our most reliable and consistent d. he's been a legit top-4 for us and id definitely (as of right now) protect him over demers, and i definitely wasnt expecting that going into the season.
