Rumor: Rangers do nothing at the deadline.

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Doubt they do anything really,maybe if someone wants pdg or rooney, that's doubtful though, i don't see us making any moves to be honest.
 
Doubt they do anything really,maybe if someone wants pdg or rooney, that's doubtful though, i don't see us making any moves to be honest.

So this team is happy with a roster that is too inconsistent and too finesse heavy. need a some grit board work and playoff style players for whenever they do make the playoffs. Can’t have a team of all finesse and 3 forewords that plays physical hockey. No soft team has ever advance or won anything in the playoffs
 
I don’t think it has anything to do with being happy or not with the roster. Half the forwards need more time in the oven. The other decisions are big ones like what to do with Buch or Strome and they’re not deadline decisions. Buch can be moved at TDL. Strome has another year. What should we be doing, going out and buying for a playoff push? Standing pat makes sense.
 
Eh. Deadline is all about Rentals and Futures. Rangers aren't ready for the former and don't absolutely need the latter. Esp in a draft year where the scouting information is limited. I don't know that they'd get anything higher than a 4th rounder for anyone their willing to sell off. I mean if Coburn gets a 7th. Does Brendan Smith get a 4th? Doubtful. I'm not sure NYR goes out of its way to move a guy for 5th rounder or lower in the draft.

More likely Rangers are looking to make a hockey trade for a top 6 center that would be here for a while.

That's not likely to happen at TDL. But the only wildcard here are teams like Calgary who are likely to blow up parts of their roster before next season. Might they do something now instead of in the summer or at the draft? maybe? But for Gorton to make any trades like that it would almost have to be a no-brainer. Instead he'll likely hold his assets for a bigger deal later.
 
I guess if someone wants one of our expiring contracts I could see it.

There’s a part of me that’s curious what they could get for Blackwell. He’s playing really well, but we have too many wingers right now, and I’m not entirely sure he’s in the long term plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare
Some kids are looking better yet the ice time won’t change with this many veterans. With a flat cap teams will likely want inexpensive prospects or current NHLers.

Imo, the Rangers are headed for a potential cap disaster if they resign these vets. You CANNOT keep everybody. Cannot resign Zibby & Buch long term since they resigned Kredier. Not with Panarin making a ton and Trouba.
 
I love Buch, but if someone throws a decent offer our way I think you have to do it. Getting the #1 and #2 pick in back to back drafts allows you for these kind of opportunities. I also think he’s overachieving and so we can sell somewhat high on him. With that said, the returns thus far have been less than enthusiastic. If there isn’t a good offer out there stand pat
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daves a mess
I love Buch, but if someone throws a decent offer our way I think you have to do it. Getting the #1 and #2 pick in back to back drafts allows you for these kind of opportunities. I also think he’s overachieving and so we can sell somewhat high on him. With that said, the returns thus far have been less than enthusiastic. If there isn’t a good offer out there stand pat

i’m just hoping this isn’t the perfect storm where the Rangers can’t move any vets for decent return so end up overpaying for an Eichel at the cost of half a dozen prospects. All to avoid a log jam. The team can’t play with five lines.
 
i’m just hoping this isn’t the perfect storm where the Rangers can’t move any vets for decent return so end up overpaying for an Eichel at the cost of half a dozen prospects. All to avoid a log jam. The team can’t play with five lines.

Can you imagine if it happens and Kravtsov is going the other way as expected? Guy busts his ass off all year in the KHL, comes here and immediately is a threat out there and next thing you know he’s on a bus to the dreariest city on the East Coast to play for the dreariest team in the NHL :laugh:
 
With that said, the Rangers can certainly stomach such a trade given all their assets but man, will send this forum into chaos for the next month.
 
I love Buch, but if someone throws a decent offer our way I think you have to do it. Getting the #1 and #2 pick in back to back drafts allows you for these kind of opportunities. I also think he’s overachieving and so we can sell somewhat high on him. With that said, the returns thus far have been less than enthusiastic. If there isn’t a good offer out there stand pat

Look at the deals being made. It's a buyer's market. I don't think we'll get an offer that will make it worth trading Buch.
 
Can you imagine if it happens and Kravtsov is going the other way as expected? Guy busts his ass off all year in the KHL, comes here and immediately is a threat out there and next thing you know he’s on a bus to the dreariest city on the East Coast to play for the dreariest team in the NHL :laugh:

we would all hate it. Even worse, the Rangers would add likely four other players.

Let’s say the Rangers did pull off that nightmare of a scenario. Can a Buffalo retain a certain percentage of that salary? Even at 30% the guy still makes $7 million per year.
 
No reason to make a move just for the sake of making one. If they can move an expiring contract, fine, but it's not like we're landing some wild overpayment for Smith. Will be completely fine if we stand pat.
 
anyone think the Rangers take a chance on Domi (or someone like that as far as a reclamation project)from Jackets ???
 
Last edited:
Everyone keeps saying "if there's a good offer for Buch, take it"

Well what's a good offer? Cause watching Toronto's 1st this year get thrown around doesn't exactly make me want to scramble to trade Buch. They're obviously very different circumstances - but I don't understand people obsessing like this is a great market.

Buch is a really, really good player. And we're getting towards prospect hugging territory where people want to just trade him so Kravtsov can play on the 1st line. It's stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad