Preference on next ASG:

Zoo16

Bye West,Hello East!
Oct 30, 2008
889
0
Columbus, OH
There's been more talk lately about whether the NHL & IIHF come to an agreement about NHLers playing in the 2014 winter olympics. Which scenario do CBJ fans prefer.

Personally, I like the NHL taking part in the winter games. So I vote they play and CBJ wait and host 2015 ASG.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
I don't see why anyone would care as long as it is soon. And, no, do not play in the summer. That is their time off. Franky, I'd rather host the draft again. The ASG is a money maker for the city and it would be fun to watch once. But after I see it once, I'll never go again.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
The Olympics are the ultimate All-Star Game. Send NHLers to Sochi in 2014 and bring the ASG back here in 2015.

You mean other than the Olympics being a world wide championship and the All-Star game being a lame exhibition in which the fans try and stuff the ballot boxes so they can get a bunch of players from their own team, deserving or not?

I get what you were trying to say, but I wouldn't even attempt to compare them.

At least when we finally get one, we might have a worthy vote again with Gaborik.
 

Skraut

Registered User
Jul 31, 2006
10,474
65
Enter city here
I'd rather the Olympics be all amateur, but since that'll never happen, each country should be able to send the best players.

My problem is that I usually end up cheering for the other countries, as I just can't bring myself to cheer for players like Kane and Backes
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
I'd rather the Olympics be all amateur, but since that'll never happen, each country should be able to send the best players.

To each their own, but I never understood why it matters. You can't compete because you made it your profession? Seems quite unfair. Hell of a lot of countries turned these people into professionals in all but name.

For hockey you already have the WJC, which is mostly amateur in concept.

No interest in really debating it. I've heard the arguments before, I haven't found them compelling. Just comments on my part really.
 

Skraut

Registered User
Jul 31, 2006
10,474
65
Enter city here
To each their own, but I never understood why it matters. You can't compete because you made it your profession? Seems quite unfair. Hell of a lot of countries turned these people into professionals in all but name.

For hockey you already have the WJC, which is mostly amateur in concept.

No interest in really debating it. I've heard the arguments before, I haven't found them compelling. Just comments on my part really.

I'd rather have amateurs, because I'd rather have a team. Something built 8-10 months before the event, and a chance to grow together, bond, and become more than a collection of very good individuals. This falls to amateurs since pro athletes can't get that time off from the teams paying their salary.

WJC is just an all star game of players coming from their various junior teams.
 

Roadman

Moving On
Sep 9, 2009
2,592
0
London OH
I'd rather have amateurs, because I'd rather have a team. Something built 8-10 months before the event, and a chance to grow together, bond, and become more than a collection of very good individuals. Since pro athletes can't get that time off from the teams paying their salary.

WJC is just an all star game of players coming from their various junior teams.

Problem comes in defining amateur. As mentioned the "Red Army" teams were hardly amateurs. The track and field teams of today are hardly amateur.

The genie is out of the bottle and there's no putting it back. Miracle is never going to happen again.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
I'd rather have amateurs, because I'd rather have a team. Something built 8-10 months before the event, and a chance to grow together, bond, and become more than a collection of very good individuals.

I get your point. You want a true national team.
 

db2011

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
3,565
474
Brooklyn
I don't like the idea that CBJ fans would prefer to disregard the rest of the fans of hockey only because the All Star Game may be held in Columbus. Would rather the poll just be Olympics 2014, ASG 2015 or no Olympics, ASG 2014 in whatever city.

I wouldn't want another team to put their interests before the Olympics, if Olympic indifference wasn't already a factor

Sorry, that's wordy. What I mean is, never mind where the ASG is held. Do you want an ASG next season, or do you want NHL players in the Olympics? That's all that should matter. Just because we *might* get the ASG shouldn't change how we approach that situation.

Know what I mean?
 
Last edited:

NotWendell

Has also never won the lottery.
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2005
27,445
7,952
Columbus, Ohio
An NHL All-Star Game without the Russians is a watered-down All-Star Game. I'm not saying the Russians are "all that," but I don't want our event to be overshadowed by the fact the Russians are home playing for their Olympic team rather than here.
 

db2011

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
3,565
474
Brooklyn
An NHL All-Star Game without the Russians is a watered-down All-Star Game. I'm not saying the Russians are "all that," but I don't want our event to be overshadowed by the fact the Russians are home playing for their Olympic team rather than here.

I think the All-Star game is a watered down affair in the best of times, but does is break down like that, between Russian players and everyone else? Sorry, I don't know the nuances here. Who determines player eligibility? Can Russia supersede all other contracts/arrangements to manipulate where Russian-born players play?

:help:
 

pete goegan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 6, 2006
13,020
350
Washington, DC
I think the All-Star game is a watered down affair in the best of times, but does is break down like that, between Russian players and everyone else? Sorry, I don't know the nuances here. Who determines player eligibility? Can Russia supersede all other contracts/arrangements to manipulate where Russian-born players play?

:help:

Several Russian players, most notably Ovechkin, have said they'll play in the Olympics no matter what the NHL does. With the KHL as an alternative and a willingness to disregard contracts suspected, they can put alot of pressure on the NHL to work things out. Seems that insurance coverage is the biggest hangup, beause the worldwide PR benefit of NHL players in the Olympics is pretty clear to all. I suspect we'll see what most here seem to want: NHL players in Sochi in '14 and all-stars in Columbus in '15.
 

db2011

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
3,565
474
Brooklyn
Several Russian players, most notably Ovechkin, have said they'll play in the Olympics no matter what the NHL does. With the KHL as an alternative and a willingness to disregard contracts suspected, they can put alot of pressure on the NHL to work things out. Seems that insurance coverage is the biggest hangup, beause the worldwide PR benefit of NHL players in the Olympics is pretty clear to all. I suspect we'll see what most here seem to want: NHL players in Sochi in '14 and all-stars in Columbus in '15.

Thank you, Pete, I hadn't heard that.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad