YOU yourself don't need a story, you're posting on a hockey forum website. You, and everyone on here, is enthusiastic enough about the sport to want to go to see these players. Put yourself in the position of a casual hockey fan and ask yourself this question: what is my incentive to go to see Latvia vs Slovakia (as an example) if I've never heard of the players, i know that it's unlikely anyone on the ice will be a meaningful player in the NHL (the only league this fan follows on a regular basis) and it is going to cost me $50 per ticket to get in the building?
Now, take that same fan and imagine what their interest level could be is there was a real effort to explain the context of Latvia vs Slovakia. For example, the organizing committee tells the story of the connection between Latvia and Ted Nolan + Bob Hartley. Or that Petr Bondra's son is playing for Latvia. Or that Montreal favourite Jaro Halak holds the tournament record for shutouts and there's a possibility you could see the next great diamond in the rough. None of these narratives have been told. It's just "hey here's some pretty high quality hockey between two countries you have no attachment to, come pay through your teeth to watch them play round robin!"
Wow, that is ridiculous. I could understand if they limited player tickets for US-Canada or Canada-Russia.Iihf this year wjc is the worst run tournament I have ever seen. As a parent of a player or in my case a grandparent of a player we are provided two tickets In the third to last row for a game that was half empty. The players who are providing all the entertainment for us are given two tickets what a shame on you. Even four would have been an not enough. Would like to know where all the money is going because I'm sure it is lining Some officials pocket. You wander why attendance is so low it's because they want nhl playoff ticket prices. Really disappointed with the iihf they should be ashamed of the exhibition there putting on for us that love hockey.
I am not missing anything. I was simply asking about the whole "Montreal is not a HOCKEY CITY, it is only a HABS CITY".
However, to your point. Ever think Hockey Canada tried this as an experiment? Maybe the idea that bringing the premiere junior hockey tournament to Montreal might help spur an interest in junior hockey? People are on this forum constantly talking about the NHL and the Olympics. The argument I read over and over again is, "Here is a chance to 'grow the game'. Introduce the game with the world best players to millions of potential new fans. Off the top of my head, doesn't more than 50% of Canada's population live in either the GTA or Montreal and it's surrounding suburbs?
Or they might of thought, "Why not try holding the tournament in the country's 2 largest cities?" The idea that Canadians would travel to the cities, make it a vacation? I can drive to Montreal in 5 1/2-6 hours. If the US had played any games in Montreal, the wife and I were thinking of making the drive.
I see your point, but the problem is that they already tried this, and it didn't work. Why make the same mistake again? Might as well give new places opportunities or go back to the successful venues.
Bottom line is, this ship has sailed.
I see your point, but the problem is that they already tried this, and it didn't work. Why make the same mistake again? Might as well give new places opportunities or go back to the successful venues.
Bottom line is, this ship has sailed.
I concur...........how about the Europeans start doing their share........or small town Canada.......when all the games are televised it`s much to easy to sit at home and swill with friends for a fraction of the cost......but sadly corporate greed is here to stay ....le sigh
I have cousins in NYC and the games are not even on tv and not even a blip on sport networks except for the occasional USA score......you can only imagine what it`s like in the other 49 states
They're on the NHL Network. I was able to watch USA-Latvia and Czech Republic-Finland when I was visiting my mother-in-law on Monday. Looking at the schedule both of today's games are being broadcast today. To say they're not even on TV is false.
I am not missing anything. I was simply asking about the whole "Montreal is not a HOCKEY CITY, it is only a HABS CITY".
However, to your point. Ever think Hockey Canada tried this as an experiment? Maybe the idea that bringing the premiere junior hockey tournament to Montreal might help spur an interest in junior hockey? People are on this forum constantly talking about the NHL and the Olympics. The argument I read over and over again is, "Here is a chance to 'grow the game'. Introduce the game with the world best players to millions of potential new fans. Off the top of my head, doesn't more than 50% of Canada's population live in either the GTA or Montreal and it's surrounding suburbs?
Or they might of thought, "Why not try holding the tournament in the country's 2 largest cities?" The idea that Canadians would travel to the cities, make it a vacation? I can drive to Montreal in 5 1/2-6 hours. If the US had played any games in Montreal, the wife and I were thinking of making the drive.
I concur...........how about the Europeans start doing their share........or small town Canada.......when all the games are televised it`s much to easy to sit at home and swill with friends for a fraction of the cost......but sadly corporate greed is here to stay ....le sigh
I have cousins in NYC and the games are not even on tv and not even a blip on sport networks except for the occasional USA score......you can only imagine what it`s like in the other 49 states
Not everyone will pay to get the NHL package.......
I know that, but the point is if they can get this tournament to be a big deal in Montreal and Toronto, then wouldn't that be where they can turn the highest profit?An experiment. (Leaves room to laugh. Returns 5 minutes later.)
Hockey Canada has 3 thoughts when it comes to this tournament: 1)Money, 2) uhm, actually, there is only one thought. If you think there are any factors other than dollar signs driving their decision making, then I have ocean front property in Arizona to sell you.
This is the same organization that banned kids from the "Red Circle" hockey program in London from skating between periods of the under 17 event a few seasons ago. "Insurance" they claimed, since this group is not affiliated with HC. Of course it wasn't very long that the word "outlaw" was also being used to describe Red Circle.
The biggest difference between HC and FIFA is the scale, not the methods in which they go about their business. Maybe less corrupt at the top, but don't kid yourself that something other than money is their first, last and most prominent focus.