Was just going to post this. Knies could be an x factorAnyone think Knies or Abruezze could steal a spot in the line up?
I'd really like Abruezze or Steeves to play 3C to slide Kampf to 4C and Spezza to 4RW.
I'm personally disappointed we didn't deal Engvall, now we're gonna be forced to play him
For me it always comes back to Willy and Matthews playing well together and Marner getting the most out Tavares when they play together. For the sake of balance I've always preferred the way the Blackhawks did it by splitting Kane and Toews and how the Penguins did it with Crosby and Malkin. Sometimes balance is better. With what we have I think I'd go...If the second line is struggling I'd like to see Bunting on it with JT and Willy. Makes the 1st line worse but if it can help the 2nd line a lot why not. Bunting could really help that line. Insert whoever with Matthews/Marner honestly, Blackwell/kerf/knies/Robertson etc...
Tbh I don't see the fit for Spezza and it's sad cuz he's a great dude it seems. Without Knies or Abruzzese even in the picture, we still stack up (at full health):Anyone think Knies or Abruezze could steal a spot in the line up?
I'd really like Abruezze or Steeves to play 3C to slide Kampf to 4C and Spezza to 4RW.
I'm personally disappointed we didn't deal Engvall, now we're gonna be forced to play him
I think the biggest thing about the 2nd line looking awful is that the 1st looks godly! It's like when the Bruins had the perfection line going, do you remember who else even played for them?Agreed on the goaltending, time will tell, but the 2nd line, though not producing, isn't a liability. They still push the play away from our net and create chances for.
I might be in the minority here but I'm thinking Blackwell will be tried I. That line too. If he has the bunting effect on that line our 1 2 3 pinch becomes very potent
For sure I hope the added experience of Gio and the younger guys simply getting older will hep with that.That's a fair assessment. That 1st line is the lynch pin for the playoffs. If they can dominate in the playoffs the way they have in the regular season, we should win a couple rounds at least.
Imo all they need is that killer instinct. The 3-1 series lead seems to lull them into the "we got this" mindset and that don't jive in playoffs.
I think we're deeply over-emphasizing the impact Knies would / could have as a 19 year old, getting his first NHL experience. If this was two years from now, I'd probably be on that train, but how many 19 year olds understand the intangibles, such as the speed of the game, enough, to make a significant difference against the type of teams we're going to see in the playoffs?Was just going to post this. Knies could be an x factor
Was just going to post this. Knies could be an x factor
Timing is everything in sports. When the Raptors won, yes the got Kawhi but LeBron had also just left the East, making the Conference wide open.
Sure, the Leafs could’ve blown through assets to get another goalie and/or forward, but as they stand they are a strong team with what we had and the recent additions. Goaltending is a massive question mark but that position is rarely filled mid-season.
After all the assets Florida and Tampa spent this season, it’s unlike they’ll be able to be big buyers next year, which means the Leafs could outbid them on any available players next year.
For me it always comes back to Willy and Matthews playing well together and Marner getting the most out Tavares when they play together. For the sake of balance I've always preferred the way the Blackhawks did it by splitting Kane and Toews and how the Penguins did it with Crosby and Malkin. Sometimes balance is better. With what we have I think I'd go...
Bunting-Matthews-Nylander
Kerfoot-Tavares-Marner
Then get the band together on the powerplay.
He's coming from college not jr. He's playing against older bigger players. Nobody is asking him to be a lindros, matthews or even a kerfoot. It's can you play your game for 9 minutes a night and be a better option than a Simmonds.Lets not get carried away here. Knies could play but we are not talking about Eric Lindros here going to come out of JR and be an x factor
The fact we are kinda hoping few college kids are going to steal a spot, tells you the state of this team. That's asking too much from a kid
Maybe they won't be able to catch our 4th line of Blackwell-Kerfoot-KaseWe need to avoid Tampa at all costs in round 1 lol.
Their 4th line of Maroon - Belmare - Perry is going to eat us alive, I can feel it.
It's a big jump from NCAA hockey to the AHL, so to jump right into the NHL is extremely hard and to do it in the playoffs?He's coming from college not jr. He's playing against older bigger players. Nobody is asking him to be a lindros, matthews or even a kerfoot. It's can you play your game for 9 minutes a night and be a better option than a Simmonds.
Have you seen the lineup of Michigan? I'd bet they'd crush any jr. Team.It's a big jump from NCAA hockey to the AHL, so to jump right into the NHL is extremely hard and to do it in the playoffs?
Hard odds to get there.
His current level of competition is against far less skilled players, though older, in general that jr players
Of course winning only the first round sounds like it should be satisfactory enough, but when you think about it, if they win round 1 this year, it'll be against either the Bolts, Panthers or the Hurricanes (slight chance of Bruins), if they can beat one of those teams, then us Leaf fans will be expecting them to win the next round and more.I'm happy with what Dubas did. I think a lot of teams bought pieces today, without a real chance to win it all in reality.
I think Kyle looks around and knows that this just isn't are year. If we can win a round and get over that hurdle, that's probably a small victory.
Some might think that's a loser's attitude, but I just think it's realistic. This team just needs some more tinkering, whether we like it, or not.
Not this season. Keep Nylander away from Matthews.For me it always comes back to Willy and Matthews playing well together and Marner getting the most out Tavares when they play together. For the sake of balance I've always preferred the way the Blackhawks did it by splitting Kane and Toews and how the Penguins did it with Crosby and Malkin. Sometimes balance is better. With what we have I think I'd go...
Bunting-Matthews-Nylander
Kerfoot-Tavares-Marner
Then get the band together on the powerplay.
5v5 | GF/60 | GA/60 | GF% |
Matthews with Marner | 5.12 | 3.44 | 59.80 |
Matthews with Nylander | 2.21 | 3.34 | 39.81 |
Tavares with Marner | 2.66 | 3.19 | 45.45 |
Tavares with Nylander | 3.33 | 4.05 | 45.07 |
What’s the sample size of games for each category though?Not this season. Keep Nylander away from Matthews.
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]5v5[/TD]
[TD]GF/60[/TD]
[TD]GA/60[/TD]
[TD]GF%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Matthews with Marner[/TD]
[TD]5.12[/TD]
[TD]3.44[/TD]
[TD]59.80[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Matthews with Nylander[/TD]
[TD]2.21[/TD]
[TD]3.34[/TD]
[TD]39.81[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tavares with Marner[/TD]
[TD]2.66[/TD]
[TD]3.19[/TD]
[TD]45.45[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tavares with Nylander[/TD]
[TD]3.33[/TD]
[TD]4.05[/TD]
[TD]45.07[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Was coming into to say exactly this. I'm always kind of underwhelmed with Kerfoot's regular season play, but to his credit, he was great in the bubble and last year against the Habs.Good thing about our second line was last year Tavares didn't play and Nylander and Kerfoot weren't good in the regular season but stepped up in the playoffs.
Nylander has played about 22% of his time with Matthews and Marner has played about 30% of his time with Tavares.What’s the sample size of games for each category though?
Fair point... I think part of the problem is that because of how dominant the first line is, it makes everything else seem 'pathetic'. Our first line is just super elite right now. And, you are right when you say the 2nd line is still pushing the play away from our net. Maybe they throw Blackwell there, but seems too high.. our problem is that we have openings on the 2nd and 4th and nothing else... so we are going to have guys perhaps playing too high in some cases. I say give it whirl... lets see what impact it has. We have 20 games to figure some of this shit out.Agreed on the goaltending, time will tell, but the 2nd line, though not producing, isn't a liability. They still push the play away from our net and create chances for.
I might be in the minority here but I'm thinking Blackwell will be tried I. That line too. If he has the bunting effect on that line our 1 2 3 pinch becomes very potent
Gave you post a like, because what you say is true, in that "if" our top players have the mental shift that you speak of then this team is almost unbeatable.Let’s hope we maintain a playoff spot lol.
At the end of the day, our core guys have to come out to this playoffs with the mentality to give it absolutely everything they got.
Leave it all on the ice, show us that “KILLER INSTINCT”. Hit, score, defend, make the necessary saves, block shots, and stand up for themselves and one another at all times.
If we saw a huge mental shift from all of our core guys to be absolute fighters and fight for their lives, we would see an insanely dangerous team.
It’s up to them to lock it in.
Does Blackwell seem too high when we had Hyman there? Give the guy a shot it's the style of play I think they need not necessarily the talent level.Fair point... I think part of the problem is that because of how dominant the first line is, it makes everything else seem 'pathetic'. Our first line is just super elite right now. And, you are right when you say the 2nd line is still pushing the play away from our net. Maybe they throw Blackwell there, but seems too high.. our problem is that we have openings on the 2nd and 4th and nothing else... so we are going to have guys perhaps playing too high in some cases. I say give it whirl... lets see what impact it has. We have 20 games to figure some of this shit out.