ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 23,292
- 16,543
I've been looking at some players in the past few years having career years at 25-29 years of age. If I just look,
top 1-10 in scoring, the ages are: 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 27, 29, 29, 28, 27.
Top 11-20 in scoring, the ages are: 26, 27, 27, 27, 26, 22, 33, 28, 26, 37.
The only player breaking the pattern there is Stützle. In the top 30, the only player under 25 is Jack Hughes.
We've also seen several players emerge, seemingly out of nowhere, at a relatively late age. Strome seems to have taken a next step at 27. Necas 25 at is an obvious example. Even guys like Marchment or Kempe only begun coming to their own after 25 years of age. Or Jared McCann. Sam Reinhart(not out of nowhere, but a significant improvement)?
Traditionally, 22-23 has been considered the peak for a hockey player, but that seriously doesn't seem to be the case anymore? Or has there just been such a massive talent drought in the league that no better players have emerged to challenge these players for all these years? Or has the league itself changed, making it so that pure athleticism and physical capability isn't enough anymore; that you actually need the experience and intuition that you can only get by playing in the league for many years?
What do you think, has there been a real shift in the league towards players peaking after 25, and later in general? Is the ideal age for a player ~28 instead of ~23 ?
top 1-10 in scoring, the ages are: 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 27, 29, 29, 28, 27.
Top 11-20 in scoring, the ages are: 26, 27, 27, 27, 26, 22, 33, 28, 26, 37.
The only player breaking the pattern there is Stützle. In the top 30, the only player under 25 is Jack Hughes.
We've also seen several players emerge, seemingly out of nowhere, at a relatively late age. Strome seems to have taken a next step at 27. Necas 25 at is an obvious example. Even guys like Marchment or Kempe only begun coming to their own after 25 years of age. Or Jared McCann. Sam Reinhart(not out of nowhere, but a significant improvement)?
Traditionally, 22-23 has been considered the peak for a hockey player, but that seriously doesn't seem to be the case anymore? Or has there just been such a massive talent drought in the league that no better players have emerged to challenge these players for all these years? Or has the league itself changed, making it so that pure athleticism and physical capability isn't enough anymore; that you actually need the experience and intuition that you can only get by playing in the league for many years?
What do you think, has there been a real shift in the league towards players peaking after 25, and later in general? Is the ideal age for a player ~28 instead of ~23 ?