Players of the Game polls? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Players of the Game polls?

The Underboss

Registered User
Dec 20, 2006
24,133
423
Florida
Hello all,
As the season ramps up, just trying to gauge interest. Are you guys still interested in the player of the game polls? Vote in the poll.
 
Hello all,
As the season ramps up, just trying to gauge interest. Are you guys still interested in the player of the game polls? Vote in the poll.

Considering you have to do all the work, sure... let's keep it going. :D

It's about time you pass the bulk of the work off to another mod, I nominate PK Cronin! :popcorn:
 
I have no problem continuing it but we should add another part to the polls IMO. If there was someway we could add a "play of the game" poll and then at the end of the season it would be awesome to look at all those plays.

I don't know, just a thought.
 
I have no problem continuing it but we should add another part to the polls IMO. If there was someway we could add a "play of the game" poll and then at the end of the season it would be awesome to look at all those plays.

I don't know, just a thought.

I honestly don't participate in the player of the game poll. Maybe I'll try this season.
 
I have no problem continuing it but we should add another part to the polls IMO. If there was someway we could add a "play of the game" poll and then at the end of the season it would be awesome to look at all those plays.

I don't know, just a thought.



That could be an option, but it would require someone making a YT clip or Gif of the goal, and that's not something I am technically good with.
 
The negative nancies on this board need to have their voices heard. The poll is currently too puppy-dog positive. Only by not voting can one express his displeasure.

Maybe add a "none of the above" selection. I'd like to make negative votes, turning the running totals into something resembling the +/- stat we all love. But, I admit, the latter sounds like too much work.
 
I also feel like it should be labeled to 1-2 players you can vote for. Far too often after a big win do I see 5-6 players being voted for per person!
 
The negative nancies on this board need to have their voices heard. The poll is currently too puppy-dog positive. Only by not voting can one express his displeasure.

Maybe add a "none of the above" selection. I'd like to make negative votes, turning the running totals into something resembling the +/- stat we all love. But, I admit, the latter sounds like too much work.

I can add a none of the above option.




I also feel like it should be labeled to 1-2 players you can vote for. Far too often after a big win do I see 5-6 players being voted for per person!


The software allows for multiple votes or 1 vote. I'm guilty of voting for multiple guys when the team has a good game.
 
It's kind of fun, but to be honest I wouldn't really miss it if it went away...so if want to step down due to the effort/time you put in I totally support that decision.
 
Considering you have to do all the work, sure... let's keep it going. :D

It's about time you pass the bulk of the work off to another mod, I nominate PK Cronin! :popcorn:

Son of a biscuit! :rant:

I always enjoy seeing which players are thought to have done well by the (m)*****.
 
like it. but as someone said, if you find it too much work, don't worry about discontinuing.

i like the multiple votes option. i have often voted for a number of players, because they were all deserving. i think that when we looked at the year end results, it was a fairly decent portrayal of who had the most value, salaries excluded.
 
Has nothing to do with setting it up or running it.

Just wanted to make sure there was still interest in participating in it, and if there were potential changes (if software allowed) that you'd want to see.

I'm here everyday anyway, so time is not really the issue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad