I wouldn't have a problem drafting him IF they can't get Carter, and IF they can get him by trading down. No way you pick him at #10. That stated, I think another idiot organization will draft him too early and save us from that mistake.What I would like to happen: Bijan Robinson at the #10 pick. I know, I know, RBs have a short lifespan. But the Eagles also have a short window of opportunity. In the meatime, the Eagles would have the best offense in the league, hands down. We've just seen the KC Chiefs win 2 SBs with an excellent offense and a serviceable defense. It can be done.
What will happen: Howie will trade down for more picks. I just see it happening.
Oh, sweet Christ on a potato, you figured out the magic words to get me to support Bijan to the Eagles.Yeah but they got Eskin to agree to retire if the Eagles take Bijan soooooo….
** cough cough ** The Falcons **cough cough**I wouldn't have a problem drafting him IF they can't get Carter, and IF they can get him by trading down. No way you pick him at #10. That stated, I think another idiot organization will draft him too early and save us from that mistake.
We've just seen the KC Chiefs win 2 SBs with an excellent offense and a serviceable defense. It can be done.
What I would like to happen: Bijan Robinson at the #10 pick. I know, I know, RBs have a short lifespan. But the Eagles also have a short window of opportunity. In the meatime, the Eagles would have the best offense in the league, hands down.
The one exception I might make is a RB who can run WR routes at a WR level, in that case, he puts a lot of stress on a defense.I mean, yes. Hell, it's the smart way to go. But they have Mahomes and Reid. They're not comparable to any other team in the league.
The Chiefs lead the NFL in EPA/dropback. Buffalo was 2nd. If you took just the gap between KC and Buffalo and turned it into a team, it would be the 10th most efficient passing attack in the NFL.
It's not that they have a short lifespan. That's secondary. It's that they don't move the needle much at all.
If you added [insert your choice for best RB in football], they still weren't close to the Chiefs. No one targeted RBs in the passing game less than the Eagles last year. Part of the reason is that they just didn't run the types of plays on which RBs make most of their impact. But the other component is that Hurts scrambles largely replace the checkdowns where those guys tend to rack up touches.
While we're at it, wasn't this the rationale for it being ok for the Chiefs to take CEH?
McShay (I know) seemed pretty confident teams sitting 1-8 would pass on Carter. Obviously a team outside the top 10 could jump up for him.If the Eagles end up with Carter, it will because everyone was passing on him. Don’t see him getting past Seattle.
McShay is a f***ing dipshitThe Chiefs just rode an athletic 7th round running back who wasn’t particularly good in college. What are we doing here?
McShay (I know) seemed pretty confident teams sitting 1-8 would pass on Carter. Obviously a team outside the top 10 could jump up for him.
Either way I would bet the house Howie does not sit at 10 and 30 and just pick. He’s going to make a move somewhere. I’d like a volume draft for once.
The one exception I might make is a RB who can run WR routes at a WR level, in that case, he puts a lot of stress on a defense.
I predict a bunch of moves, given this seems to be a draft without any consensus, if Howie sticks to his draft board, players he loves will fall to where they're steals in his eyes - and that provides multiple opportunities for arbitrage.The Chiefs just rode an athletic 7th round running back who wasn’t particularly good in college. What are we doing here?
McShay (I know) seemed pretty confident teams sitting 1-8 would pass on Carter. Obviously a team outside the top 10 could jump up for him.
Either way I would bet the house Howie does not sit at 10 and 30 and just pick. He’s going to make a move somewhere. I’d like a volume draft for once.
Meh, I'll take Brian Westbrook.One of the really neat things that PFF has found in their data is that this does exist and is measurable. But what's an even bigger impact is a WR you can move into the backfield. And they started saying this way before Deebo.
Basically what I'm saying is Percy Harvin forever.
That’s incredibly offensive to Todd McShayMcShay is a f***ing dipshit
I could be wrong but I think depending on who is there he is likely going there.** cough cough ** The Falcons **cough cough**
It is an offensive league though and has been trending that way for years. Still dont think that warrants taking Bijan at 10. If they trade down a bit and he is there I think I might though.I absolutely hate the mindset people take in sports where they say "well the team that won the Super Bowl last year did it this way", so that's the way we have to do it!
now it's "the chiefs won a SB without playing defense, so that's what we need to copy!"
It is an offensive league though and has been trending that way for years. Still dont think that warrants taking Bijan at 10. If they trade down a bit and he is there I think I might though.
Sure they can, but a great offense will nearly always beat a great defense these days with the way the rules are written. If one of the corners is there that is where I go, but if they trade back and Bijan is still there, I wont hate the pick. The rest of you can quibble about it. The NFC is crap and he is an impact player that can help them get back to the Super Bowl in the next few years.I think this is even a weird argument because defensive players can affect the offense, so drafting D is important too. Just because we didn't beat Mahomes in a shootout, people think Defense is irrelevant at #10.
As much as throwing dimes down the field is important, pressuring the QB consistently is wildly important as well.
We're worse on the line right now and we have a lot of Sacks to replace. That's why #10, to me, is Nolan Smith or Jalen Carter (if he makes it).
You’ve always been an intellectual
You’ve always been an intellectual
Of course, ESPN sucks.