FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 55,596
- 92,163
The Jets with a QB based on last year, at the very least, won’t be scared of anybody, just depends on if Rodgers is still that guy as to whether or not they’re contenders.I don't get this AT ALL from the Jets' perspective. Giving up a 1st and 2nd for 1, or maybe 2 years of Rodgers in the (late) autumn of his career.
They're not gonna win the Super Bowl. Not in that conference. Not in that division even.
So, why trade away those picks? To get back into the playoffs? To put the Jets back on the map? Purely PR reasons? That's a steep price to pay...
I mean, ESPN put Quinnen Williams in their "Jets playmakers" graphic. I just don't think the Jets are anywhere close to "just a QB away" from winning it all. No way!
The Jets with a QB based on last year, at the very least, won’t be scared of anybody, just depends on if Rodgers is still that guy as to whether or not they’re contenders.
They did, but if the Jets miss the playoffs, guys are getting fired, it’ll be someone else’s problem to fix.Yeah, I mean I get why they wanted him and that they didn't have any other avenue to a top QB. I just think they should have stood firm on what they were going to give up, considering Rodgers is gonna turn 40 this year. I don't have a problem with the trade itself, I just think they overpayed, by a lot.
They coalesce the vapors of the sports landscape into viable and meaningful comprehensionjust curious..how awful are Kiper and McShay lol
They coalesce the vapors of the sports landscape into viable and meaningful comprehension
I just checked fanduel and they have some props up.Did they just pull all sports betting for the NFL Draft? I can't find it anywhere.
Are you in NJ?I have to do a deep dive to even find the NFL in my FanDuel menu. What the heck.
I genuinely can't find any props. Searched NFL Draft and returned nothing.