Contract Termination: [PHI] F Ryan Johansen placed on waivers by the Flyers for the purpose of contract termination (Johansen grieving)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,056
11,608
Shelbyville, TN
I meant that this isn't a situation where a guy needs a fresh start after being marred by injuries like Monahan, who has pretty much universally liked by his team mates. Johansen was lazy in Colorado and their core players didn't like his effort. Not the type of player you want around a young team.
Well not only that I'm not sure its the kind of injuries you can make better and really come back from even if the effort was there.

He was never that fast to start with, but multiple leg/ankle injuries have pretty much taken whatever was there away. No amount of effort or being a good teammate is going to fix that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,250
10,877
"Why not both" meme probably fits best. He has had some pretty bad injuries over the years, the one he got in the playoffs in 2017, we thought maybe he had a ruptured achilles in last year with the Preds, but it turned out not to have been ruptured. Anyway, I don't doubt stuff has taken a toll and he is physically diminished. He claims his hip injury is too bad to play (conveniently diagnosed after being sent to the minors by Philly, despite that he could play through it with Colorado). Philly apparently accepted that. At the time in letting him not report to the AHL, later in not pursuing a buyout, and right up until he started doing dance moves at his wedding? They were ok with LTIRing him and accepting his injured status. But at the same time, spotting grounds for material breach and termination was a bonus opportunity for them to save that LTIR hassle (plus whatever leftover amount insurance wasn't covering?)

He's probably "hurting". Which lots of veteran players are. To what extent he could play through it (in his case probably very ineffectively), vs. sit out on LTIR, I don't know. But according to him and his agent he needs surgery, they have consulted on that with Philly staff and third party doctors, and he actually had hip surgery scheduled at the time of termination. So I think it's fair to believe there is indeed an injury. :dunno:
In terms of LTIR, Philly has Ellis on LTIR as well. Are they going to be able to operate u see the cap even with Ellis contract if they are successful with this termination?
 

Lunatik

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2012
56,918
9,000
Dubois definitely used a No Movement Clause to get out of Columbus…did you watch some of his final games for the Jackets…he barely moved
No he did not. Dubois wasn't even eligible for a NTC or NMC while he was in Columbus

Players are not allowed to have these clauses during their "RFA Years", which is either less than 7 years accrued, or under the age of 27... for Dubois that ended on June 30, 2024 at teh age of 26 because he had accrued 7 NHL seasons.
 

Ciao

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2010
10,161
5,998
Toronto
No he did not. Dubois wasn't even eligible for a NTC or NMC while he was in Columbus

Players are not allowed to have these clauses during their "RFA Years", which is either less than 7 years accrued, or under the age of 27... for Dubois that ended on June 30, 2024 at teh age of 26 because he had accrued 7 NHL seasons.
Whoosh.

PLD wasn't moving on the ice, dude! A one-player strike. He might as well have carried a sign on a stick that said "I'm done here!"
 

Beukeboom Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
16,059
1,989
Chicago, IL
Visit site
No he did not. Dubois wasn't even eligible for a NTC or NMC while he was in Columbus

Players are not allowed to have these clauses during their "RFA Years", which is either less than 7 years accrued, or under the age of 27... for Dubois that ended on June 30, 2024 at teh age of 26 because he had accrued 7 NHL seasons.
Might want to get your sarcasm detector checked! ;o)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattihp

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,195
14,945
They've only now filed a grievance? How can this process take so long? How!?
Kind of seems like a way a club can wiggle out of a contract. What if a club needed cap space and tried this to clear room? Seems like the idea a contract can be terminated by the club first is wrong. Should be a process where the contract stays in place until the union and club present their cases to an arbitrator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,300
20,859
Denver Colorado
“Good faith”

LOL, that's a rich statement from his agent,
“My client was in extreme pain and can hardly walk

Johansen 2 days later at teammates wedding dancing
full
 
Last edited:

kingpest19

Registered User
Sep 21, 2004
12,344
764
So after having a back and forth last night about this with someone, was a there a reason the league didn't null the trade? Would it be up to the Flyers to say they wanted the trade undone?
 

thedjpd

Registered User
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2002
3,675
945
San Jose, CA
So after having a back and forth last night about this with someone, was a there a reason the league didn't null the trade? Would it be up to the Flyers to say they wanted the trade undone?

The Flyers wanted the 1st round pick. This isn’t a situation of where they wanted the player. What they wanted was to either re-assign and ride him out, or just buy him out directly. By claiming severe injury and unable to play after the assigned him down, Johansen negated both options. The smart play would have been to report to the AHL, played 1 game, then do your injury claim.

Flyers probably let him know that they’ll buy him out instead, and he’d lose some money if that happened. So, he stopped it.
 

kingpest19

Registered User
Sep 21, 2004
12,344
764
The Flyers wanted the 1st round pick. This isn’t a situation of where they wanted the player. What they wanted was to either re-assign and ride him out, or just buy him out directly. By claiming severe injury and unable to play after the assigned him down, Johansen negated both options. The smart play would have been to report to the AHL, played 1 game, then do your injury claim.

Flyers probably let him know that they’ll buy him out instead, and he’d lose some money if that happened. So, he stopped it.
I understand all that. I was asking because someone was claiming that Philly knew about the injury before the trade and that if it were true that they didn't, the league would have undone the trade.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,097
8,956
Kind of seems like a way a club can wiggle out of a contract. What if a club needed cap space and tried this to clear room? Seems like the idea a contract can be terminated by the club first is wrong. Should be a process where the contract stays in place until the union and club present their cases to an arbitrator.
The Preds would have a keen eye on this process. An extra $4 million in Cap space could open them up to making more moves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PREDy 4 the Cup

PREDy 4 the Cup

Go Preds Go!!
Aug 14, 2011
3,738
909
Johansen was such garbage for this whole contract. Huge let down. Dude has some audacity even filing grievance. He should count his lucky stars he got what we got already out of this contract he didn’t earn. Then he’s out dancing at a wedding but filing grievance?! Whatta greedy chump.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad