Giant Yankee Pens
Registered User
- May 17, 2010
- 589
- 82
Adding to that is the new coach and system that's in now, that's the biggest and most important change imo.
Good signing, Shero.
Err, wait, I thought we fired the guy who likes dishing out expensive contracts to bottom six players?
Why do people hate this guy? I don't understand lol. It's a good deal IMO.
2.2 is not expensive.
At least when his deal's up we should have some 3rd line types ready to take his spot on ELCs.
poor sid...
Um, not that it's a great top six, but how many teams in the league have a better top 6 than the pens? Maybe 5? You guys act like dupuis in the top six now means they can't trade for a wing at the deadline.
I don't hate the guy, but he is the added piece that is supposed to make losing Neal's production palatable (Hornqvist is awesome though).
So looking at his stat line (13G, 32pts) which is great for a third liner, listening to GMJR say that they wanted Spaling and that he's physical and versatile, and hearing something about him from Preds fans (hard worker, character guy) everything seems great. He's defensively responsible and good on the PK, etc, etc.
So I watch some Preds games, look up some highlights, read some news articles and blogs from NsH media and fans.
Spaling is a versatile third liner who played in every situation on the Preds and put up a career year last year.
However, his offensive production came through a great shooting % that he can hopefully stay close to, top 6 minutes, top 6 linemates, and easy zone starts. Even if you believe that NSH is a black hole offensively, Spaling is not going to have top 6 minutes, top 6 linemates, or such easy zone starts in Pittsburgh (unless he gets slotted on Crosby's wing). So his offensive production is likely to decrease.
Plus Spaling has some of the worst possession numbers of Preds's forwards (15th worst out of 16) and although the Preds aren't a great possession team, they are very close to Pittsburgh's 5v5 numbers last year. And because of linemates, easy starts, etc. Spaling should have done better in comparison to his own teammates.
That physicality that GMJR is talking about is largely absent from his game. He's decent along the boards and has a lot of energy. But he doesn't really hit people.
His defense is good but Sutter, Dupuis and Goc are all better. And he only played on Nashville's 2nd unit PK - a PK that was ranked 25th in the league slightly devaluing Spaling as a PK specialist.
Then he takes the team to arbitration and ends up with a two year, 2.2 million contract which would have been easier to handle at 2-2.2 million for a year or at least a three year term.
If he performs close to his production last year then all is well.
If not the Pens traded for Neal ($5 million) for Hornqvist + Spaling ($6.45 million) with only two years of Spaling.
Um to be honest, our new bottom 6 is just middle of the pack. Last year it was in the bottom 3, likely the worst. It is a huge improvement, but nothing close to elite.
Um to be honest, our new bottom 6 is just middle of the pack. Last year it was in the bottom 3, likely the worst. It is a huge improvement, but nothing close to elite.
Every penny counts when you're a team like the Pens who is hard up against the cap and still needs upgrades in the top six. Especially when a (IMO) superior player in Dwight King just signed for 300k less.
I agree with a lot of what you said but I really think this is the wrong way to look at that trade. If that trade hadn't have happened, it would have been Neal at 5 million plus someone else we would have signed. So Neal + Glass (6.45) for Hornqvist +Spaling (6.45). Obviously you could have gone after someone like Stempniak but this is the way it should be looked at in my opinion.
Or we could, ya know, extend him. He's 25. It'd be a nice surprise if any of our forwards aside from Kapanen/Bennett turned into a reliable top 9 player.
I agree with a lot of what you said but I really think this is the wrong way to look at that trade. If that trade hadn't have happened, it would have been Neal at 5 million plus someone else we would have signed. So Neal + Glass (6.45) for Hornqvist +Spaling (6.45). Obviously you could have gone after someone like Stempniak but this is the way it should be looked at in my opinion.
Um to be honest, our new bottom 6 is just middle of the pack. Last year it was in the bottom 3, likely the worst. It is a huge improvement, but nothing close to elite.
Yea, but we need to stop making the extra on Neal GLASS. You're the second person who has done this. And while you wrote out Stempniak later, the fact that you put Neal + Glass just taints the discussion.
No one wants Crosby + Glass for ****'s sake, let alone Neal + Glass.
The point is, Neal is arguably better than Hornqvist, marginally more expensive, and you could easily have found better, cheaper options to replace Spaling in this equation.
Dwight King has played 2 full NHL seasons. I would imagine that plays a factor.
I know our board seems to have a mancrush on him. But he was pretty meh in the playoff games I saw this year. Lost quite a few board battles despite being 230 lbs.
Yeah I'm a big homer when it comes to what we've done this offseason. But I'd say middle of the pack bottom six is fair. But that's all we've really needed. A bottom six that doesn't get owned, provides energy and can score a big goal occasionally.
Getting Sid/Geno with a proper supporting cast takes care of the rest. We're one top 6 forward away from having that.
Yup sorry about that.
Dwight King has played 2 full NHL seasons. I would imagine that plays a factor.
I know our board seems to have a mancrush on him. But he was pretty meh in the playoff games I saw this year. Lost quite a few board battles despite being 230 lbs.
Ok? I never said I wanted Glass. My point was that you're going to have to overpay to get a guy to play on the third line. Glass isn't even a decent 4th liner and he got 1.45. Pouliot had 36 points last year and got 4 million dollars. Where are all of these better and cheaper options?