Salary Cap: Pens '24-'25 Salary Thread: The Crosbicles Volume XIX

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,882
78,790
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Graves and Shea last night was one of the worst performances I witnessed, totally incapable of getting puck out of zone, just got lucky that they did not get scored on multiple times
Now that may have been more due to Shea being total trainwreck, but still and Geno got the honor to have them behind a lot

I don’t really get the complaints about Shea on here.

He’s incredibly mediocre, but is essentially just Chad Ruhwedel 2.0. The difference being he isn’t taking a spot from anyone. Our AHL defense depth is hideous.
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,577
3,544
Isn't this the issue with Graves throughout his career though? His expected and per 60 stats make him look like he's a sufficient enough player. The eye test and decision making makes it obvious he isn't...
His WTF/60 competes with Jack Johnson by my eye.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,354
87,264
Redmond, WA
I feel like Graves is a decent bottom pair D that is just grossly overpaid, he was carried to relevance by playing on a good pair and the Penguins grossly overpaid him for what he is. If he was on a $2 million AAV deal rather than a $4.5 million AAV deal, I think people would have fewer issues with him. He's a bigger Chad Ruhwedel when he was paid to be a Dumoulin replacement.

Maybe looking at Lysell

I'm not sure what Lysell does for them at this point. They're crazy deep at forward in WBS and I'm not sure Lysell is much of an upgrade on the NHL roster.

I think they need to be looking at defensemen if they're targeting those former high pick reclamation project types. I don't see many sports for forwards with how the team is sitting, both in the NHL and AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LurkerLarry

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,739
26,205
I'm not sure what Lysell does for them at this point. They're crazy deep at forward in WBS and I'm not sure Lysell is much of an upgrade on the NHL roster.

I think they need to be looking at defensemen if they're targeting those former high pick reclamation project types. I don't see many sports for forwards with how the team is sitting, both in the NHL and AHL.

I just picked the first name that I recognised whose age and points totals looked interesting, but looking at the Bruins forum, I feel like he looks interesting (if the price is right) as a guy who should be a lot more than he is and who could benefit from a shake up trade. The tools are there, it's just not quite working. And as discussed with the Hoglander trade rumours, there's potentially a ton of space opening here soon.

Still, plenty of other names, some of who might make more sense.
 

McGroarty2

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,300
2,243
PA
What are thoughts on JT Miller? Could he be acquired to play 2C with Malkin moving to wing? Pettersson and Bunting going back the other way would work cap wise. Not sure what else would have to be added.

Rakell Crosby Rust
Malkin Miller Tomasino
O'Connor Glass Puljujarvi
Nieto Lizotte Acciari
Hayes, Beauvilier

Pickering Karlsson
Joseph Letang
Graves Grzelcyk
Shea
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

Ulf5

Registered User
Feb 21, 2017
1,678
1,264
What are thoughts on JT Miller? Could he be acquired to play 2C with Malkin moving to wing? Pettersson and Bunting going back the other way would work cap wise. Not sure what else would have to be added.

Rakell Crosby Rust
Malkin Miller Tomasino
O'Connor Glass Puljujarvi
Nieto Lizotte Acciari
Hayes, Beauvilier

Pickering Karlsson
Joseph Letang
Graves Grzelcyk
Shea
I would be all for it. But I don't think Ole Jimmy would be too keen on what we'd willing to offer in return. And it would certainly be bettered by other teams.
 

chethejet

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
8,776
1,943
I think where the Pens are at the TDL will dictate moves. Petts with Pickering up and Graves contract just being hard to move, is the player who will be moved for a top pick.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,354
87,264
Redmond, WA
This team is absolutely not in a position where they should be trading assets for a guy like JT Miller. If they were, they should have just paid Guentzel what he wanted last off-season.

I just picked the first name that I recognised whose age and points totals looked interesting, but looking at the Bruins forum, I feel like he looks interesting (if the price is right) as a guy who should be a lot more than he is and who could benefit from a shake up trade. The tools are there, it's just not quite working. And as discussed with the Hoglander trade rumours, there's potentially a ton of space opening here soon.

Still, plenty of other names, some of who might make more sense.

Honestly the guy I like from Providence is Poitras. Made the NHL last yera as a 19 year old and had a decent season (15 points in 33 games), but really struggled this year and got demoted back to the AHL where he's doing well.

I can't imagine the Bruins would be interested in trading him, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

Ulf5

Registered User
Feb 21, 2017
1,678
1,264
This team is absolutely not in a position where they should be trading assets for a guy like JT Miller. If they were, they should have just paid Guentzel what he wanted.
The team apparently can't even tank properly.
They're on track for a draft pick that might be more mid than Rust. While high end talent, especially in 30s, should be avoided another top 6 option might be a good option.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
36,082
1,977
Montreal, QC
Right now, the big decisions are Pettersson, the goaltending and the middle-six forwards imo. There is no way we can continue to win games consistently with the lack of production we are receiving from the likes of Drew O'Connor, Anthony Beauvillier and the two players we scratch up front (Hayes and Puljujarvi, through no fault of his own). Tomasino has had a couple of mediocre performances and he is already in Sullivan's dog house (shocker). Glass is clearly not as good as the No. 2 RW as he is as the No. 3 C.

The first line is dominating right now, and Bunting and Malkin can and are producing. If we can put a third line together with Glass and Tomasino together, then I think it starts to look interesting. Lizotte is perfect in that fourth-line center role and Acciari is much better as a winger and always has been.

O'Connor on the fourth line would improve the depth, too. I suppose we could either call up Koivunen or reinsert Puljujarvi to play on the third line, which leaves us with a hole at No. 2 RW (again).

I wonder if we could get a top-six winger for Pettersson. This defense is scary without him, but his departure is likely only a matter of time. I would still look to see what it would cost to keep him. Marcus Pettersson is invaluable for this team at this time. The other option might be to trade a goaltender. Jarry seems to have righted the ship TO SOME EXTENT, and Nedeljkovic was always the easier player to move. I wonder if Ned for a young-ish winger makes sense. Would the Habs have interest? Does Ned for Joshua Roy make sense?

I also think we should keep an eye on Dallas. I think they are planning changes soon. There are lots of forwards on that team who could help. Obviously, Pettersson would interest them.

This team can make the playoffs, like it or not. We just need middle-six forward production and we are getting nothing from the third line. It's a problem.
 

chethejet

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
8,776
1,943
Lot of time to go before the TDL. Petts is the logical choice here but dubas has to consider the playoffs if they are close. But Pickering is key. If he can play well enough to be a decent LD, then Petts can be moved for a nice pick. I don't move him for less than a first or consecutive seconds. But I am Ok with the trade and then major moves in the off season to add more talent in the system.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad