You think fleury was as critical as Matt Murray to the 2016 and 2017 cups? Fleury has 1 cup as a starter. This isnt a point of argument. Calling him a 3 time champ is like calling Osgood a 4 time champ. Absurd.
I'd say they both were 1-1/2 to 1-1/2.
1st. 2016: No Fleury, the Pens may not have even competed for the playoffs at all saving their bacon time and time again in the early season for Murray to even get that chance. Then a concussion sidelined him.
2nd. 2017: Fleury (starter) played all of the first two rounds vs the tougher competition in CBJ and then what most feel was the true SCF against the Capitals into the ECF's. The final two teams were Ottawa and then the Preds being two teams that probably never should have made it that far. That's the price of having 2 top teams meet too early in the playoffs.
Fleury's fingerprints are all over those cups. Roles flipped between runs.
Also, note, the Pens were a machine filled with depth. That finals with the Preds the Pens were reduced to playing 3 hard rounds getting abused the entire way while already being down Letang before the playoffs were started. They were a shot blocking machine. Murray hardly faced many shots in the 11 games he played. Yes... he only played 11 games, 1 in relief of Fleury . Fleury got yanked after pitching two solid games where he gave up 4 goals in the 3rd game after only giving up 2 in two games, 1 being a shutout vs Ottawa.
So as the starter Murray only started 10 of the 25 games.
Fleury has more right to those cups than most understand. In 2016 when he just did a quick hold of the cup probably feeling like he didn't deserve it was kind of disappointing. Not for him they don't even challenge for it in the first place. Plus, you don't know if you'll win it again, even though they did.