Toggle sidebar

Confirmed with Link: Panarin taking leave of absence from NYR (Warning in First Post)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll stress it again, the "save the family" theory is completely unsubstantiated.

Apart from the narrative that "Putin is evil and kills people" (which is true in itself but saying that it has something to do with Panarin is stretching it madly).
Why now? Why not a year ago? Why even take a leave if he's really up to moving them?
It's completely made up by random people posting stuff they find unquestionable in teh Internets.

The reason above is compelling, but carries nothing to tie it to Bread. His "opposition" to Putin is even only got notoriety simply bc he's an athlete, and with a high-profile athlete in Russia it surely gets noticed.
And most don't do it (speak out) not out of fear but either bc they're dumb, don't care, or most often choose to be on good terms with those in power solely for their personal gain (Ovechkin is a perfect example).
That's it, nothing more to see here. He's not the first and not the last to speak out too.

I still believe it's the org doing, maybe they know more about the issue, maybe they're just afraid.
Anyway I believe this was exactly the plan by those who did it. And they're are professional if rather unsophisticated political trolls.

As for the alleged "incident", even if he did hit somebody in a bar 10 years ago SO WHAT? He's 18, drunk and relatively unknown. The other party could've shared some or all of these traits then. How often these premises lead to some altercation in a bar anywhere in the world? Like this very minute?
And what's the diff if he hit a girl or a boy, aren't we all equal now? If it was just a push or a shove or a slap, then it shouldn't matter surely? And if he beat someone to a pulp... all the more so. In the latter case though (and only in the latter case) might pose a problem.

Anyway the org must surely understand, even if he *did* req a LOA, the continuing unexplained absence raises doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KirkAlbuquerque and EdJovanovski
NickyFotiu said:
My simple answer:

If innocent says you are 100% innocent and get back to your life today.

If guilty then take a unpaid LOA and make it right as best as you can. As horrible as allegation as it is he was 18. People make mistakes. Not excusing it (if it happened) but saying now as a man you can make things better.

I feel sitting out gives it life. If innocent there is no reason you should be punished in any way. Live your life.
Click to expand...
Gonna be honest. No one cares about your opinion. Nor should anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnSandvich
ColonialsHockey10 said:
Are you implying they’re using the drama from a rumor that Panarin beat a girl in order to hide a minor injury?

I mean come on. Re-read that thought!
Click to expand...

It's pretty reasonable to think he needed a recharge, had stuff to take care of AND also had a few nagging physical or mental fatigue related things so this break could be addressing all that and more.

It could also be he only took the LOA bc just hearing these rumors spooked him even though there's zero validity to them and literally every1 but a disproven idiot supports him...but that just doesn't seem right.
 
Last edited:
Crease said:
The only people giving it life are Russian Trollbots
Click to expand...
Literally the only thing that's fueling it now from the Russians perspective is his absence. The same as it was from the beginning.

There was zero public support for the gist of naz's trolling from the get go. I'd wager it might even have gone by realtively unnoticed and it was pretty much so until the news of the "LOA" have come from across the pond.

If after the insinuation was published he simply strolled onto the ice like nothing's happened, the story would be dying embers by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyFotiu and haveandare
tlk said:
I'll stress it again, the "save the family" theory is completely unsubstantiated.

Apart from the narrative that "Putin is evil and kills people" (which is true in itself but saying that it has something to do with Panarin is stretching it madly).
Why now? Why not a year ago? Why even take a leave if he's really up to moving them?
It's completely made up by random people posting stuff they find unquestionable in teh Internets.

The reason above is compelling, but carries nothing to tie it to Bread. His "opposition" to Putin is even only got notoriety simply bc he's an athlete, and with a high-profile athlete in Russia it surely gets noticed.
And most don't do it (speak out) not out of fear but either bc they're dumb, don't care, or most often choose to be on good terms with those in power solely for their personal gain (Ovechkin is a perfect example).
That's it, nothing more to see here. He's not the first and not the last to speak out too.

I still believe it's the org doing, maybe they know more about the issue, maybe they're just afraid.
Anyway I believe this was exactly the plan by those who did it. And they're are professional if rather unsophisticated political trolls.

As for the alleged "incident", even if he did hit somebody in a bar 10 years ago SO WHAT? He's 18, drunk and relatively unknown. The other party could've shared some or all of these traits then. How often these premises lead to some altercation in a bar anywhere in the world? Like this very minute?
And what's the diff if he hit a girl or a boy, aren't we all equal now? If it was just a push or a shove or a slap, then it shouldn't matter surely? And if he beat someone to a pulp... all the more so. In the latter case though (and only in the latter case) might pose a problem.

Anyway the org must surely understand, even if he *did* req a LOA, the continuing unexplained absence raises doubt.
Click to expand...

This is a terrible take.
 
HockeyBasedNYC said:
Most likely. Better than saying indefinitely or he doesn't know. Let's hope we have Bread back for one of the Devils games!
Click to expand...

day to day and indefinitely is really 6 of one, half dozen of the other....people hear day to day and think it will be short and hear indefinitely and assume it will be long. but really they are both are saying we don't know and will see each day if anything changes.
 
Leetch3 said:
day to day and indefinitely is really 6 of one, half dozen of the other....people hear day to day and think it will be short and hear indefinitely and assume it will be long. but really they are both are saying we don't know and will see each day if anything changes.
Click to expand...

Out indefinitely is a completely different statement than day-to-day, at least to me.

In this scenario I tend to agree with you a little more
 
HockeyBasedNYC said:
Out indefinitely is a completely different statement than day-to-day, at least to me.

In this scenario I tend to agree with you a little more
Click to expand...

I agree with you. it is taken completely different ways....but we've seen guys day to day with injuries that were out a month because they simply didn't know because there wasn't a set timetable like with a broken bone. it was just see each day how the guy feels
 
Leetch3 said:
day to day and indefinitely is really 6 of one, half dozen of the other....people hear day to day and think it will be short and hear indefinitely and assume it will be long. but really they are both are saying we don't know and will see each day if anything changes.
Click to expand...
That's definitely true if you look at the literal definition of the phrases, but I think generally it's true that day-to-day is typically used to imply a shoter-term situation whereas indefinitely implies something considerably longer. Sometimes, of course, day-to-day becomes a much longer-term issue (like everything with the Mets), but in general I think DTD does imply short term.
 
HockeyBasedNYC said:
Out indefinitely is a completely different statement than day-to-day, at least to me.

In this scenario I tend to agree with you a little more
Click to expand...
Keep in mind that Quinn knows 'indefinitely' will lead to angst and therefore is less likely to use that term. Even with D2D, he's technically not lying even if he's out a while longer so his ass is still covered (like Zib's D2D for a month+ last year).
 
romba said:
Keep in mind that Quinn knows 'indefinitely' will lead to angst and therefore is less likely to use that term. Even with D2D, he's technically not lying even if he's out a while longer so his ass is still covered (like Zib's D2D for a month+ last year).
Click to expand...

lol so true
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom