I've seen them all play, but sure tell me more about my life lol. I don't care who is the most "skilled". I care about what they accomplished. Mogilny accomplished jack shit compared to the other players listed. All that skill but couldn't even finish top 5 in pts one time in his entire career. Definitely better than ross/hart/lindsay winners lol.
Raw goal totals don't mean anything when comparing players from different eras. Even youngsters understand that. Unless you're one of those people who think Nicholls peaked higher as a goal scorer than OV, Howe, Bobby Hull, Bure, etc because he scored 70 goals and they never did right?
Nobody cares what you care about. Your opinion based on stats doesnt dictate if they were good or not
And thats cute - in one breathe, discount Mogilny based on stats and then in the next imply a player such as Nichols couldnt have been better than the greats based on his stats
So you choose to follow stats when it suits you but then make counter arguments that go against stats. You walk conversations into circles because you have no direction, your opinion is entirely based on stats. If you actually did watch themplay as you claim, you wouldnt be arguing that Mogilny is the obviously-worst player, consistently making it seem like its undebatable.
But yeah, keep thinking Artemi Panarin is better than Alexander Mogilny lmfao. You hold those stats you love so dearly tight as Panarin scores 2 points in a series to a division rival.
'I dont care who is more skilled' - yeah, that was real evident when you said Mogilny was the worst player of the group. Remind me what else matters in hockey besides skill (or is it Panarin's incredible stature, coming in at 30+ lbs lighter than Mogilny?)
Mark Messier is the 2nd greatest player ever because thats what his stats and awards say. You got it boss