Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 80,113
- 52,311
This is absolute nonsense.Caps were once again a better team when he was off the ice. Their young players got them to playoffs.
This is absolute nonsense.Caps were once again a better team when he was off the ice. Their young players got them to playoffs.
Ovechkin 5vs5 rel-gf% -6.92This is absolute nonsense.
He’s on a crap team.Ovechkin 5vs5 rel-gf% -6.92
Yeah and the crap team had a worse goal share when Ovechkin was on the ice.He’s on a crap team.
He’s the only guy who can score. He dragged that club to the playoffs.
So what? It’s the same as plus/minus you’re at the mercy of the club you’re on. And Ovi had a weird year where he was shooting around 8 percent. When that finally normalized he caught fire and dragged that club into the playoffs.Yeah and the crap team had a worse goal share when Ovechkin was on the ice.
Maybe they're in a playoff spot all year long if Ovechkin isn't one of the worst players in the league for the first half of the season.So what? It’s the same as plus/minus you’re at the mercy of the club you’re on. And Ovi had a weird year where he was shooting around 8 percent. When that finally normalized he caught fire and dragged that club into the playoffs.
That is a garbage team. It has no business being in the postseason but they had an elite player who was able to get them there. He did it in a fluke season where he scored at a create under 10 points and was 38 years old. No matter how you slice it it was a heroic effort.
This is an even dumber take than your first one. They had zero chance without him.Maybe they're in a playoff spot all year long if Ovechkin isn't one of the worst players in the league for the first half of the season.
Nah, he was playing like shit. His goals don't make up for his lack of everything else. His relative defensive metrics are catastrophic and 30 goals getting the PP minutes he does is not great value at all.This is an even dumber take than your first one. They had zero chance without him.
And no he didn’t play that badly. Once again, his shooting percentage was inexplicably low. A shooting percentage of around eight is almost impossibly bad. It’s suggests an injury or some other issue. And when it normalized he came roaring back.
Without Ovi they have no chance at the postseason. It’s laughable to suggest otherwise.
He’s on a shit team. Any player is going to look bad on a bad club.Nah, he was playing like shit. His goals don't make up for his lack of everything else. His relative defensive metrics are catastrophic and 30 goals getting the PP minutes he does is not great value at all.
He carried a dogshit team to the playoffs but he's a liability every time he steps on the ice.
Just hilarious. It literally doesn't make any sense.
Caps were once again a better team when he was off the ice. Their young players got them to playoffs.
Maybe they're in a playoff spot all year long if Ovechkin isn't one of the worst players in the league for the first half of the season.
The guy’s 38 years old. He’s not the player he was and saying he’s not great defensively is fine. But at the same time, he scores a crap ton of goals. The Caps should be giving him some help but there’s nothing really there. He’s still an elite goal scorer.There's truth in both of these statements. There is a ZERO percent chance they make the playoffs without his scoring spurt over the last 39 games.
But he also is a liability many nights, the nights where he looks tired and just doesn't move his legs. I really think he needs to drop like 15-20 pounds for these last two seasons.
LOL Ovechkin, Strome and Lindgren got them to the dance. Especially Lindgren. The young players getting ice time like they should have under Laviolette was icing on the cake.
No chance. There's so little offensive talent/creativity on the roster. And Kuznetsov was dragging the team down the first half in and out of the locker room.
We don't need to be silly here.
38 year-old Ovechkin playing on the 18th ranked team (worst offensive team in the conference) puts up 0+0 in 4 games against the best team in the league.
33 year-old Crosby playing on the 5th ranked team in the league (2nd best offensive team in the league) puts up 1+1 in 6 games against the 12th ranked Islanders.
31 year-old Crosby playing on the 7th ranked team in the league (6th best offensive team in the league) puts up 0+1 in 4 games against the 5th ranked Islanders.
Results are results, and 31/33 year old Crosby playing on significantly better teams, at a significantly younger age, against lower quality teams is still a lot worse than this post-season by Ovi.
Not at all defending a poor playoff performance (it 100% was), but I have a good feeling the ones shitting on Ovi right now without any consideration of context, wouldn't be giving this much (or way more) flack to Crosby for those showings.
It's almost like goals against don't matter to some people?With what offense?
Not a single young player on the Caps scored more than 33 points.
If you are using point production as your basis of evaluation, how can it be a lot worse than literally 0?Results are results, and 31/33 year old Crosby playing on significantly better teams, at a significantly younger age, against lower quality teams is still a lot worse than this post-season by Ovi.
If you are using point production as your basis of evaluation, how can it be a lot worse than literally 0?
I'm not sure if OV dragged them to playoffs. Yes, the team isn't very good, they don't have a lot of high end talent....but he only contributed to 29% of their goals.He’s on a crap team.
He’s the only guy who can score. He dragged that club to the playoffs.
That’s a huge number man. He scored a third of their goals. Matthews ‘only’ accounted for 23 percent of the Leafs offense.I'm not sure if OV dragged them to playoffs. Yes, the team isn't very good, they don't have a lot of high end talent....but he only contributed to 29% of their goals.
It's not a huge number at all. He didn't score a third of their goals, he had points on 29% of the team's goals. In comparison, if you looked at the leading scorers for each team (even though Ovechkin wasn't one) and sorted by who factored into the most goals as a percentage of team goals, Ovechkin would be 22nd out of 32 teams.That’s a huge number man. He scored a third of their goals. Matthews ‘only’ accounted for 23 percent of the Leafs offense.
guys didnt even bother trying this year in the playoffs. not sure how anyone ever puts him above Crosby when he literally helped the other team more than his own this year
I understand he's old but he can atleast put his stick on the ice and try
its just so obvious that he didnt care about the playoffs and his only remaining goal is beating the record.
It's not a huge number at all. He didn't score a third of their goals, he had points on 29% of the team's goals. In comparison, if you looked at the leading scorers for each team (even though Ovechkin wasn't one) and sorted by who factored into the most goals as a percentage of team goals, Ovechkin would be 22nd out of 32 teams.
Top 10:
1 - Kucherov - 49%
2 - MacKinnon - 46%
3 - McDavid - 45%
4 - Panarin - 43%
5 - Pastrnak - 41%
6 - Kaprizov - 38%
7 - Miller - 37%
8 - Crosby - 37%
9 - Thomas - 36%
10 - Matthews - 35%
Bedard, even though he missed 14 games, was at 34%.
You goddamned analytics fanatics make me laugh. You're the same people who told us Jeff Schultz was an actual good NHL Dman, when anyone with eyes could tell he sucked balls. Analytics are 1 tool in the toolbox. We get that Ovie sucked in the playoffs, that doesn't mean he didn't help drag a squad that didn't deserve to be there, to the playoffs.Ovechkin 5vs5 rel-gf% -6.92
they atleast try to compete. I dunno whats up with OV but Ive never seen him this uninterested before. I dunno he was off to a poor start and then ended up with 30 goals this season anyways I figured he would have more fight in him.So when Malkin went 0G 0A in the middle of his prime at 28 and when Crosby went 0G 1A at just 31 both in sweeps, was it because they didn't care?
And we can go back to the HFBoards threads when these happened, it was not a case of dominant but bad luck, they were invisible.
It sucks, it was truly sad to see him look so abjectly horrible, but the insane laziness of "it's because all he cares about is the record" is just so tired at this point. At this stage of his career I think he was extremely relieved to make the playoffs again, since 2008 it's been what he expects, why would it be different now?
We can say he flat out sucked without constantly going to the record.
This just in, 38 year old is no longer a top 10 player in the NHL.