Even if you’re truly not winning anything?
Because the Habs didn’t win a damn thing using PD and KK the way the did. All they did was inflate the value of PDs eventual contract that they ultimately didn’t want to pay.
Once you commit to graduating an 18 year old, you have to play him and play him a lot.
Well not defending the old management, but in the 2 years you mentioned, we made the playoffs once, and went to the Cup Finals another. Which for us, it's a feature in itself. So we keep hearing about hindsight....that's an analysis based on hindsight. I mean...imagine we win the Cup.....personnally, I still believe KK would have been used wrong....but Danault's play helped us win.
KK should not have been in the NHL. Once he was, he should have been a permanent fixture on a 3rd and 4th line. With some time on the PP. So you gradually bring him in. Danault leaves....you tell KK that you have confidence he does the job. And he does. Though that remains to be seen 'cause we don't know who his wingers would have been.
Unless you are an exceptional, you either don't start at 18. Or you don't play regularly. I see no problem being slowly brought up. Problem with KK is that the mixed messages between...you are good enough to start in the NHL at 18....but...you are bad enough to not be dressed. Clearly the communication wasn't good. And we paid the price. And frankly, while KK will now start to progress....chances are he misread his own talent as he underrated his game and will be the most underpaid player in the NHL...lol