Proposal: OTT - CLB - NSH
- Thread starter Bernify
- Start date
Do you know how much Ottawa gave up for Duchene? This would be a terrible return for them. The Nashville pick would certainly be on Ottawa's side in this proposal.
Bernify
Registered User
- May 28, 2014
- 226
- 5
Sunk cost fallacy. Duchene was a much more valuable asset back when they dealt for him. I also happen to agree that they should be getting more, but would Nashville give up their first and second for Panarin? I'm not too sure.
TkachukNorris79
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2018
- 1,491
- 1,364
I'm kinda biased, but Duchene and Panarin probably cost the exact same. Panarin has him beat 1.20 p/g over Duchene's 1.12. But Duchene is a centre and at least comes with the possibility of re-signing.
Ottawa gets whatever you get for Panarin.
Ottawa gets whatever you get for Panarin.
Bernify
Registered User
- May 28, 2014
- 226
- 5
The more I think about it, the more adding Nashville's first makes more sense to Ottawa's package. I think it balances out really well, and I doubt the Preds balk at an extra 2nd to acquire Panarin.
That said, Panarin is a better player than Duchene, at least in my opinion, and would get a slight premium.
The fact that there is a 0% chance on signing in Nashville makes him undesirable to add for our top prospect and a 1st. At least with stone and Duchene you have a good chance on resigning. So pass on this
While most CBJ fans are enamored with acquiring Duchene (myself included), I don't know if it's worth swapping him for Panarin for a playoff run and only netting a 2nd round pick if Duchene walks. We'd need to have an extension for him worked out in order for this to make sense.
edit...counterproposal:
To OTT: Nasvhille's 2019 1st + 2020 2nd + Tolvanen + Abramov/Carlsson
To NSH: Panarin
To CBJ: Duchene (extended)
edit...counterproposal:
To OTT: Nasvhille's 2019 1st + 2020 2nd + Tolvanen + Abramov/Carlsson
To NSH: Panarin
To CBJ: Duchene (extended)
Last edited:
AdmiralsFan24
Registered User
If Nashville is giving up Tolvanen, a 1st and a 2nd for a potential rental (and I really don't want them to do that and I'm far from the only one) we would just cut Columbus out of this deal and take Duchene ourselves as he's far more likely to re-sign with us than Panarin.
Confused by the edit. Does this have Nashville trading Tolvanen + their 1st + a 2020 2nd round pick for a pure rental?
I know futures get overrated sometimes but that would truly be going all in on this season only and leave the Preds with absolutely nothing in their system, especially if Fabbro doesn't sign. I see absolutely no reason for the Preds to do that. They would be better off offering this to Ottawa with a window to negotiate a contract in advance with Stone like they did with Turris.
I know futures get overrated sometimes but that would truly be going all in on this season only and leave the Preds with absolutely nothing in their system, especially if Fabbro doesn't sign. I see absolutely no reason for the Preds to do that. They would be better off offering this to Ottawa with a window to negotiate a contract in advance with Stone like they did with Turris.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
stempniaksen
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2008
- 11,167
- 4,492
I feel like it would be easier for Ottawa and Nashville to just cut Columbus out of the deal and move Tolvanen+ for Duchene.
Doubt they move Tolvanen for a rental, so Duchene would need to come with a contract. Tolvanen/Fabbro + 1st is a much better return than most teams could offer though, so I'm all for it as a Sens fan.
Doubt they move Tolvanen for a rental, so Duchene would need to come with a contract. Tolvanen/Fabbro + 1st is a much better return than most teams could offer though, so I'm all for it as a Sens fan.
Crede777
Deputized
- Dec 16, 2009
- 14,836
- 4,549
Tolvanen + 1st + 2nd is too steep a price for Panarin to Nashville. And I'm a Jackets fan who expects a top prospect + 1st for Panarin at the minimum.
I know Nashville is interested in Panarin but IMO it doesn't make sense for them. Their window isn't closing provided Saros can fill in when Rinne is phased out. Plus Panarin wants to live on the East Coast.
I know Nashville is interested in Panarin but IMO it doesn't make sense for them. Their window isn't closing provided Saros can fill in when Rinne is phased out. Plus Panarin wants to live on the East Coast.
JustaFinnishGuy
Joonas Donskoi avi but not a SEA fan ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Pretty sweet turnout for my Preds in this one, doubt it'll add up value wise.
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Brutal for Columbus...amazing deal for Nashville
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Columbus gives up: 1st 2019, Alex Wennberg, Anthony Duclair
Columbus gets: Kyle Turris, Craig Smith
Ottawa gives up: Matt Duchene, Mark Stone
Ottawa gets: Eeli Tolvanen, NSH 1st 2019, CBJ 1st 2019, Calle Jarnkrok, Alex Wennberg
Nashville gives up: 1st 2019, Kyle Turris, Craig Smith, Eeli Tolvanen, Calle Jarnkrok
Nashville gets: Matt Duchene, Mark Stone
I don't hate it, but, meh. Doesn't do much good for Columbus.
Last edited:
Nashville gives up Turris, Smith, jarnkrok, Tolvenen and 2019 1st. But I don't think that gets you stone and Duchene anyway.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Nsh gives up too much here. Its also bad for CBJ with the opportunity cost of getting a rental as the main piece back.
