I'm right there with you, plus each game means a little more.
I'm not much of a basketball fan altogether, so for me the college game is more enjoyable. I like my sports low scoring, so I'd rather watch a 65-62 game than a race to 95. I can watch a whole college game and enjoy it, but there's so many possessions in an NBA game I can't get into it until late in the game. The possessions are so quick, 1 or 2 passes and boom make a shot. I'd rather watch teams pass for awhile, but I know I'm not the norm.
The scores are so low in college because no one can make a basket.
Must be from all the 3-pointers they miss. Love it when they pass it around ten times then jack up a three. Really entertaining
The scores are so low in college because no one can make a basket.
2880 seconds in an NBA game / 24 second shot clock = a minimum of 120 possession
2400 seconds in a college game / 35 second shot clock = a minimum of 68.57 possessions
Yeah, it's all because the players can't shoot, has nothing to do with the timing rules.
You watch the games, college players can't shoot. Taj Gibson as an average shooting 4 is a better shooter than most college 2 guards. Those pick and pops at the top of the key that just about every power forward in the pros can drain is a college 3 pointer.
Also, the longer shot clock isn't a positive. Again for people who like college more than pro, you must love highschool basketball where there is no shot clock or commercial breaks.
Wow that goaltending... might have been the right call but there was no way that was going in.
The college game sucks because they aren't as good at shooting as the best players in the game. Alright, gotcha.
Kentucky is everything wrong with college athletics.