They’ve been consistently top 10 defensively since he took over. For the years prior they were bottom 10 under babcock. You can literally draw a line when they started to become more reliable defensively and it started when Keefe took over...because comparing teams years apart with vastly different lineups makes sense .. jebus some people ... if your trying to make a point , perhaps comparing an UNEMPLOYED coach to Keefe probably works more against you than for you....just saying ... hey if you like inconstant effort and teams that always exit in the 1st round ... that's on you ...
They’ve been consistently top 10 defensively since he took over. For the years prior they were bottom 10 under babcock. You can literally draw a line when they started to become more reliable defensively and it started when Keefe took over.
They’ve been consistently top 10 defensively since he took over. For the years prior they were bottom 10 under babcock. You can literally draw a line when they started to become more reliable defensively and it started when Keefe took over.
Season | GP | W | L | T | OTL | SOL | Pts | Pct | GF | GA | PIM | Atten. | Coach | Result | GF/G | GA/G | |
2016-17 | 82 | 40 | 27 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 95 | 0.579 | 251 | 242 | 19764 | Mike Babcock | Lost in round 1 | 3.1 | 3.0 | ||
2017-18 | 82 | 49 | 26 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 105 | 0.640 | 277 | 232 | 19187 | Mike Babcock | Lost in round 1 | 3.4 | 2.8 | ||
2018-19 | 82 | 46 | 28 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 100 | 0.610 | 286 | 251 | 19276 | Mike Babcock | Lost in round 1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | ||
2019-20 | 70 | 36 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 81 | 0.579 | 238 | 227 | 19302 | Babcock, Keefe {+} | Lost in round 1 | 3.4 | 3.2 | ||
2020-21 | 56 | 35 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 77 | 0.688 | 187 | 148 | Sheldon Keefe | Lost in round 1 | 3.3 | 2.6 | |||
2021-22 | 55 | 35 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 74 | 0.673 | 202 | 163 | 15329 | Sheldon Keefe | 3.7 | 3.0 |
This is so disingenuous, there’s literally a point in time you can see a dramatic change. It’s when Keefe took over, so if these core players matured like you’re claiming why are we still having issues getting out of round one?So what your saying is there is no difference between a core of players who is very young an inexperienced and a core that is older and has experience? Gotcha. Hockey may not be your thing.
..anyone know where Dryden McKay signed?
As for goalie options, I'd be looking at Holtby and Varlamov. Honestly I'd try to bring both of them in if Mrazek can be jettisoned. Two long time vets that have what it takes and shouldn't be too costly.
I love Campbell, but the Leafs in their current state aren't the right team for him to succeed. I think he'd do really well on a team with competent goalie coaching like the Isles. Trade Campbell and a pick/prospect for Varlamov. Trade another pick/prospect to Dallas for Holtby. Pray that a team like Arizona or Buffalo will take Mrazek.
I would be ok with a Gibson+Woll tandem over Campbell + Mrázek.Not a ton really. I think the most likely option is jack regains form and we re sign him for 3.5-4.5 depending. Then we look to move on mrazek.
BUT if he doesn’t. Options are:
Go big:
If Anaheim signals rebuild. Gibson will want out. He hates losing. Same with helle. Those would be your only established starters that could trade for.
let Campbell walk. Trade mrazek plus ( a lot) for one of those 2.
a lesser move would be Varlamov. But thar would be east….. grubauer maybe? If we believe in him but that would be a huge risk.
2.) go for ufa
-fleury
-husso
-holtby
-kuemper
-Francouz are the only real options.
of “contenders” us and colorado/Edmonton would need goaltending. We would be second on the list probably for those players. Don’t know if I would spend on husso.
3.) go for young rfa. That was my pick. I wanted vanacek or hill last year. Still could be an option
Best goalie of the trades would be helley. Most likely would be Gibson.
of the ufa might have to go with husso or francouz.
not a ton of great options.
I would be ok with a Gibson+Woll tandem over Campbell + Mrázek.
Plus a second line winger. Too many holes.
Yup and if a move were to be made how does that play out
Have we fallen that low ?I would be ok with a Gibson+Woll tandem over Campbell + Mrázek.
It just pissess me off that other teams have such unique value propositions like Texas and Florida have less tax... L.A has nice climate. We can’t use our benefit which is our ability to have a high payroll. Not a fan of the cap either.Exactly.
This isn't just with the Leafs - I think league wide we are going to see a pretty underwhelming deadline, because everyone is so capped out and those that aren't are still on pandemic budgets.
As I've said for a decade, the hard cap has ruined this game.
It just pissess me off that other teams have such unique value propositions like Texas and Florida have less tax... L.A has nice climate. We can’t use our benefit which is our ability to have a high payroll. Not a fan of the cap either.
Rask ?Would be nice to draft and develop a starting goalie. It’s been way too long
A soft cap or luxury tax cap system is something the NHL will never agree to, but it's something that would massively improve the overall product.
I’d love Gibson. He’s injury prone though, and making around 6.5m I believe.