ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 15,947
- 21,190
Taylor Hall hatty, I know he left in a bad way but I'd still take him back if he was a relative cheap add.
Taylor Hall hatty, I know he left in a bad way but I'd still take him back if he was a relative cheap add.
Taylor Hall hatty, I know he left in a bad way but I'd still take him back if he was a relative cheap add.
Pavel Zacha masterclass tonight vs the Isles.
Taylor Hall hatty, I know he left in a bad way but I'd still take him back if he was a relative cheap add.
I'm so in for Hall. We NEED a top 6er but don't have many assets to add a one and with his struggles he could be a guy we could be able to add. He's still generating offense.
Chicago (pretty bad team) crunching Dallas (good team) 6-1 tonight.
AHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
Can we even afford Hall? We can’t even put anybody that makes anything significant on IR.
No, not really unless we get rid of someone with a alot of cap hit.
You could swing it through retentions and sending down the goon. Maybe it takes double retention but the cap is no excuse not to be able to add a guy. It’s not like there’s no avenue to make it work.
I think soOk yeah with retention and all, I guess there is a way.
I guess the question would be would Hall want to be back and I'd only do it if he wants to be here.
Oh well if Rogalski wasn’t here yet I’m sure he will be intrigued.I think so
It’s been 5 years and I don’t think he took anything that happened at the end personally.
I think the only guys he’s played with as a Devil who are still here are Nico, Bratt and Jack. And when Noesen was a Devil the first time.
Bastian had a call up or two when Hall was still here.
Everything else is different. Fitz was the assistant GM when he was last here and not a single member of the coaching staff remains. He may have run into Brylin in training camp when the AHL staff and players are on hand at the beginning of camp.
Rogalski wasn’t even here yet when Hall last played here.
He SCORED the softy on himself lol. By the way, I have no idea why the Capitals keep (mostly) forcing a goalie split so far. Lindgren's numbers vs Thompson's numbers are Marty vs Cory levels of difference. They're probably sandbagging themselves and have no doubt cost themselves potentially 3-4 points by playing the goalies right down the middle and using Lindgren so much. Lindgren is a 31 year old who is only in his third full season in the NHL. Thompson definitely has the more upside, even though he was in the ECHL for a while and maybe a late bloomer and under the radar.He didn't really give up a softy. He earned a softy.
I didn't know much about what happened in that game, until I started reviewing all the games this morning. That was largely due to DeSmith being absolutely brutal. If Lindgren didn't score a goal on himself and give us the softy of the year, I'm pretty sure DeSmith would have probably had a softy of the night goal.Chicago (pretty bad team) crunching Dallas (good team) 6-1 tonight.
I don't even think he left in that bad of a way. Other than calling out the fans for booing in a game we were leading/tied in and then pulling a Hulk Hogan gesture at the fans the next game after he scored.Taylor Hall hatty, I know he left in a bad way but I'd still take him back if he was a relative cheap add.
If we got Taylor Hall back, the league would probably ding us for getting him back 5-6 years later when we're closer to contention, instead of keeping him and giving him the 8 year deal for $9-$11 million that we thought it might take to keep him here lol.
I'm just making a stupid joke.