Is it that players aren't stepping up, or players aren't good enough? You can't really expect someone to take the reigns if they just aren't capable of it at the NHL level.
I think Chia probably thought he had enough options that one of them would pan out. Unfortunately that hasn't been the case so far.
- Strome: It's only 3 games in but so far the fit/chemistry hasn't been right. Let's give it some more time. (Regarding the trade, obviously a cap dump but the return for Eberle was poor at the time, and he could've waited for Eberle to up his value to start the season which would have been a good bet given Eberle's poor shooting percentage last year. Then he could've traded Eberle in season to a team desperate for scoring help for assets which he could then package to another team for a suitable top 6 replacement at the deadline. There's the risk though of trying to move a $6M player in season and limiting the teams that can afford him.)
- Puljujarvi: They probably hoped he'd be ready to step in but I don't think they expected him to be a big contributor in the top 6. Not a big surprise he's back in the AHL to start. Needs seasoning.
- Slepyshev: I think a step forward from Slepy was to be expected given his playoff performance but the injury definitely sets him back to start the season.
- Caggiula: Similar expectations for Caggiula especially with the chemistry shown on McDavid's line (small sample size) in the playoffs. He's really struggled out of the gate though and is now injured. Damn sophomore jinx better F off!
- Jokinen: I don't think he was really considered for a top line spot but I think middle 6 depth scoring was expected and he hasn't been very noticable to this point. Not bad, but not moving the needle really.
- Yamamoto: He couldn't have been expected to be where he is now. Pleasant surprise who has struggled with regular season play and barring a change should be sent down sooner than later, ie: in the next
So I can see why Chia felt optimistic that one of these options could step up. To this point though none of those options has produced a single point through 3 games which is concerning. If all of them have to move up one spot higher than they're comfortable with that's going to add pressure, and sink or swim policies tend to produce more sinkers than swimmers.