Llewzaher
Registered User
I just think Sabres are in a constant state of rebuilding, whether intentionally or not … Thompson is almost in his prime and we know BA is a fan ..but maybe we aren’t good partners with Buffalo 

In my humble opinion, the Sabres will be buyers, not sellers. They cannot, and will not, be mired in a perpetual rebuild. They need to start being more competitive. I think they'll start using some of their defensive strength to acquire players where needed.Ask is going to be a lot.....
Thompson is signed through 2029-30 at $7.1 AAV. His modified NTC kicks in this coming season.
Sabres also have most of their picks as well.
Only thing that makes me think there is even a remote chance of it happening is because they have a habit of "giving up" on what they have. While I don't find the idea as laughable as Jakey, I also don't hold much hope.Depends on Buffalo’s intentions this offseason, and I don’t really have a read on what I think they might do. A package involving 4th overall going their way and Tage Thompson coming back our way, with whatever’s necessary to include to balance value out, may simply be a trade they’re not interested in making because it’s not a direction they want to head into.
If they do want to pull the plug and start over, we could surely come up with something to entice them, which would be a tough pill to swallow after so many years in a row of not making the playoffs. If that’s not their vision going forward, I don’t think we make good trading partners with Buffalo.
That's all been said in the past, but the perpetual rebuild seems to live on.In my humble opinion, the Sabres will be buyers, not sellers. They cannot, and will not, be mired in a perpetual rebuild. They need to start being more competitive. I think they'll start using some of their defensive strength to acquire players where needed.
My semantics dictates that a rebuild is not complete until there is success.IMO Buffalo's rebuild ended long ago.
Since then they've been failing at taking what they got out of their rebuild along with futures and using them to retool and get over the hump.
Poor asset management and roster building.
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?I just think Sabres are in a constant state of rebuilding, whether intentionally or not … Thompson is almost in his prime and we know BA is a fan ..but maybe we aren’t good partners with Buffalo![]()
I think Buffalo will be a player in the UFA market. They NEED to be a playoff contender. The franchise is a disaster.In my humble opinion, the Sabres will be buyers, not sellers. They cannot, and will not, be mired in a perpetual rebuild. They need to start being more competitive. I think they'll start using some of their defensive strength to acquire players where needed.
Cheering on Gabe Smith and the Mocton Wildcats. By all indications Caleb Desnoyers of Mocton will be the 4thOA in just over a month!
UMHis play might convince another team to take him before he gets to us. I would love UHC to get him.
@Dr VinnyBoombatz
What does your top 5 look like?
I completely agree. We don't need anymore draft picks, I would be disappointed if we traded down for more picks. As long as they take the best player available or trade the pick, I'll be happy.I'm for taking the pick. Desnoyers or Hagens at 4. We need quality way more than quantity so I'm not interested in moving down for extra assets.
BPA @ 4
I think it's totally reasonable to have Misa at 1 OA. I think there's a bit more confidence among scouts that Schaefer becomes a 1D like Heiskanen compared to Misa's likelihood of becoming a 1C like Barzal. However, both cases seem very likely. If I had to choose between Barzal or Heiskanen I'd go with Barzal.1 - Misa
2 - Schaefer
3 - Hagens
4 - Desnoyers
5 - Martone
I know Schaefer is considered to be the consensus #1, but I really like Misa and I really like Ecklund in that 2nd tier and considering moving him ahead of Martone into the top 5
6 - Ecklund
7 - Frondell
8 - McQueen
9 - Smith
10 - Martin
Normally I would take Heiskanen as BPA, however, the C position has been so elusive for this team (and the other team I normally follow) that I would take the C.I think it's totally reasonable to have Misa at 1 OA. I think there's a bit more confidence among scouts that Schaefer becomes a 1D like Heiskanen compared to Misa's likelihood of becoming a 1C like Barzal. However, both cases seem very likely. If I had to choose between Barzal or Heiskanen I'd go with Barzal.
It doesn't have to be a "young" center, just a center who will help them get to that next level. I get it, you want a young'ish center if you're giving up the 4th overall, but, in reality they just want to get into the playoffs and keep the positive momentum in Utah going forward for the city and the state.@Freakshow can you name a young C that we would trade 4 OA for that another club would be willing to part with?