Leafblooded
Registered User
Yay, thank you ShatkinsesAll this movement yet we still can't get rid of Grichuk huh
Yay, thank you ShatkinsesAll this movement yet we still can't get rid of Grichuk huh
Nope you worry about that then. We'll have guys ready to replace by that point and more trades will be inevitable. Just enjoy the ride and hope they find a way to make it all work. Ryu will be off the books at the same time and no Grichuk who's money was coming off at the same time. We will lose guys to free agency as well. Teo could go chasing same as GurrielAnybody a little bit worried it's just two years of Chapmann and then we lose him to free agency? I know it'll be a good two years but with having to pay our own big guns I wonder if we can retain him.
I think that was the cost of us sending money.The praise for Pinto is coming from outside of Toronto too. Weird the Rockies would just toss him away like that.
Don't worry I'm sure the trio of Grichuk, Blackmon and Bryant will lead them to glory...assuming Coors Field isn't swallowed by the supermassive black hole generated from the lack of defense in the outfield.
Not sure how to feel about this Grichuk trade. My first thought was I was happy he was gone. But to be honest he's probably a better player than Tapia and a solid player to have off the bench.
Not sure how to feel about this Grichuk trade. My first thought was I was happy he was gone. But to be honest he's probably a better player than Tapia and a solid player to have off the bench. Though they're very different players. If they need the money then great. Not sure how much money they're sending, but I don't think the team is any better than they were 3 hours ago, and they might be slightly worse. At a quick glance you'd probably rather Grichuk playing CF when needed rather than Tapia as well. The prospect they got looks promising so that's a plus. If the money they send makes money equal this year and they take all Grichuk's money next year that's decent. Don't get me wrong, I'm not down on the trade. I'm just kind of concerned it makes us slightly worse this year unless they needed the money for something,
At least I don't have to worry bout Montoyo overplaying Grichuk. I'd assume Kirk should be getting DH opportunities rather than Tapia.
He may have been a pro and showed up to play every day but this is the pro's and that's what you do. Grichuk is an overpaid bench player and the team got a lot faster in this deal. I'm honestly surprised they were able to move him for what they got. This was a pretty nice trade for the Jays.
Yeah this doesn't make me feel any better about the trade. Almost a wash this year and we're paying significant money next year as well. I'll feel better if Montoyo doesn't overplay Tapia but I can just see him doing something stupid like using him as the leadoff hitter when he plays.
Tapia can play other OF positions. 15 innings is not proof to the contrary.I made a silly meme post about it, but on the whole I'm not sure what to think about the Grichuk trade. For all the kvetching about him and his contract, Grichuk wasn't terrible and he was at least very good 4th OF type: he could serviceably play all 3 OF positions and his bat was capable of getting hot and carrying him for a few weeks if he had to be in the lineup regularly. People keep treating his contract like a financial albatross, but $10m isn't really that big of a deal and swapping Tapia in for him only saves about $6m. That's maybe enough to get you a couple of good(ish) pen arms, but it's not like it's massive financial freedom and the team can reshape a portion of its roster on the added budget. Or at least it would be if the Jays weren't wiping out that surplus by sending it to the Rockies to help pay off Randal's contract.
Besides that while I get that Tapia offers an attractive package in that he's what the Jays lacked (speed, a lefty bat) he's also had nearly 1500 career PAs to show what he is: a mostly replacement level OF with apparently sub-optimal D (metrics seem to indicate that his results have been acceptable in left, but mostly trash in small samples in CF and RF) and a well below average bat (career wRC+ of 78).
Someone said he's Ben Revere with an arm, but I'd argue he's worse Ben Revere with an arm because at least Ben Revere could hit his way on base while he wasn't taking any walks. Tapia takes a few more walks, but hits a lot less.
Honestly this reminds me of the hype machine around how Emlio Bonifacio was going to be the secret weapon from the Marlins deal on the expectation that he could simply start hitting better in the Jays' lineup while also being a versatile super-sub. Instead we got a guy who could play 3 or 4 positions, all of them poorly, and whose speed was neutered by the fact that he could not hit to save his life.
And yeah, "but lefty bat!" except he has some reverse splits, with a higher career average vs LHPs than RHPs while the rest of the #s don't skew hard enough to the platoon side to showcase his value as a hand-specific bat off the bench while also still being well below average (career wRC+ of 80 vs RHP compared to 71 vs LHP). And remember, in the context of wRC+, "average" would qualify as a fairly bad hitter. 100 wRC+ hitters over the last 5 years combine are the likes of the remains of Ben Zobrist, Mike Zunino, Travis d'Arnaud, Curtis Granderson, the bad Dexter Fowler, Aledmys Diaz, Brandon Crawford, Starlin Castro, Evan Longoria's downswing, Travis Shaw, Jay Bruce, Nick Markakis, etc. Serviceable players, sure but usually in the context of adding value as a defender or having an obvious keystone skill like power or contact hitting. And certainly not someone that should be slotting higher than the bottom 3rd of your order unless things are bad.
All I'm trying to say is that this is different, but I don't know if I'd call it even a close win for the Jays, nevermind an easy one.
Yeah, I see that too. So what I am going to do is look at it from the other side of the fence. I am not wondering if they think there is some more to unlock in Tapia. I looked at his minor league numbers, and with the exception of his very first season in pro ball, every year he was well over .300 (most at .320ish and above), and his OPS was usually well in excess of .800.I made a silly meme post about it, but on the whole I'm not sure what to think about the Grichuk trade. For all the kvetching about him and his contract, Grichuk wasn't terrible and he was at least very good 4th OF type: he could serviceably play all 3 OF positions and his bat was capable of getting hot and carrying him for a few weeks if he had to be in the lineup regularly. People keep treating his contract like a financial albatross, but $10m isn't really that big of a deal and swapping Tapia in for him only saves about $6m. That's maybe enough to get you a couple of good(ish) pen arms, but it's not like it's massive financial freedom and the team can reshape a portion of its roster on the added budget. Or at least it would be if the Jays weren't wiping out that surplus by sending it to the Rockies to help pay off Randal's contract.
Besides that while I get that Tapia offers an attractive package in that he's what the Jays lacked (speed, a lefty bat) he's also had nearly 1500 career PAs to show what he is: a mostly replacement level OF with apparently sub-optimal D (metrics seem to indicate that his results have been acceptable in left, but mostly trash in small samples in CF and RF) and a well below average bat (career wRC+ of 78).
Someone said he's Ben Revere with an arm, but I'd argue he's worse Ben Revere with an arm because at least Ben Revere could hit his way on base while he wasn't taking any walks. Tapia takes a few more walks, but hits a lot less.
Honestly this reminds me of the hype machine around how Emlio Bonifacio was going to be the secret weapon from the Marlins deal on the expectation that he could simply start hitting better in the Jays' lineup while also being a versatile super-sub. Instead we got a guy who could play 3 or 4 positions, all of them poorly, and whose speed was neutered by the fact that he could not hit to save his life.
And yeah, "but lefty bat!" except he has some reverse splits, with a higher career average vs LHPs than RHPs while the rest of the #s don't skew hard enough to the platoon side to showcase his value as a hand-specific bat off the bench while also still being well below average (career wRC+ of 80 vs RHP compared to 71 vs LHP). And remember, in the context of wRC+, "average" would qualify as a fairly bad hitter. 100 wRC+ hitters over the last 5 years combine are the likes of the remains of Ben Zobrist, Mike Zunino, Travis d'Arnaud, Curtis Granderson, the bad Dexter Fowler, Aledmys Diaz, Brandon Crawford, Starlin Castro, Evan Longoria's downswing, Travis Shaw, Jay Bruce, Nick Markakis, etc. Serviceable players, sure but usually in the context of adding value as a defender or having an obvious keystone skill like power or contact hitting. And certainly not someone that should be slotting higher than the bottom 3rd of your order unless things are bad.
All I'm trying to say is that this is different, but I don't know if I'd call it even a close win for the Jays, nevermind an easy one.
According to MLB Pipeline writer, Keegan Matheson, Pinto just missed out on the Rockies top 30 list for MLB Pipeline. The diminutive second baseman also didn’t feature on Fangraphs top prospects list.
With that being said though, he did place 19th on Baseball America’s list. They note that he has great hand-eye coordination and a short stroke. Coupled with his smaller stature, Pinto has a great eye at the plate, which you can see by the fact he walked 17% of the time.
Despite being only 5’6, Pinto does have sneaky power as he hit those three home runs mentioned in the section above, which also notes his 22 extra base hits.
I asked Francys Romero (@FrancysRomeroFR) for any information on the 19-year-old second baseman. To paraphrase, [Pinto] is a pure hitter, with great bat speed. He has a plus arm (60 grade) and plus speed (70 grade). He also has the ability for extra base hits.