I wouldn't mind a few on there. ERod is one interesting name, he could do well in Tampa.
Sure, let him go to Tampa. Or Seattle. He's not the guy we want here.
I wouldn't mind a few on there. ERod is one interesting name, he could do well in Tampa.
NRD and Merriman mentioned they think the contact for Husso would be problematic for the Sabres.There are a handful of guys on that list that would be great. I'd like to see us add at least one UFA forward to give us a little more depth, create internal competition, etc. Obviously Husso would be great.![]()
NRD and Merriman mentioned they think the contact for Husso would be problematic for the Sabres.
No Sabres on CampbellThere are a handful of guys on that list that would be great. I'd like to see us add at least one UFA forward to give us a little more depth, create internal competition, etc. Obviously Husso would be great.![]()
or they have heard about the kind of money/term Husso wants and it doesn't meet KA's rolling eyes, hesitancy and general skittishness after 2 years.That's fine, but unless they're actually privy to negotiations (which haven't even started yet), they don't know anything.
I never said I wanted him here. He has worked his ass off to get where he is and would make sense for a cap team like Tampa.Sure, let him go to Tampa. Or Seattle. He's not the guy we want here.
or they have heard about the kind of money/term Husso wants and it doesn't meet KA's rolling eyes, hesitancy and general skittishness after 2 years.
Its a solid opinion from 2 guys more about straight shooting than b.s.'ing
I never said I wanted him here. He has worked his ass off to get where he is and would make sense for a cap team like Tampa.
No Sabres on Campbell
Subban to a "playoff contender"![]()
He’s still very good defensively and physical. People think he will get anywhere between 3m - 4.5m. How much would you pay for a 40ish point winger, who’s big, physical and very good defensively?Marchment seems like a contender for me to get a massive overpay based on being on a top team in the league and going on a crazy streak after not showing much promise in his career before that. 58 points in 91 games, and 47 came from last season alone at age 27. Sprinkled with mediocre AHL production. It’s hard to gauge what would be a fair price.
I’d be alright with that price tag with mid term. I remember seeing a month ago some people estimating ~6m which is just too much for his track record.He’s still very good defensively and physical. People think he will get anywhere between 3m - 4.5m. How much would you pay for a 40ish point winger, who’s big, physical and very good defensively?
your right really, any chatter if real is coming from agents right now to push agenda'sLike I said, don't take rumours too seriously and then there's no need for a
![]()
Oh god I don’t touch 6m at all. I wouldn’t mind giving him term though even in the 4s. Those kinds of players are valuable and can be tough to find.I’d be alright with that price tag with mid term. I remember seeing a month ago some people estimating ~6m which is just too much for his track record.
God, I hope Adams can find a better goaltender than Dell and Tokarski.
He knows where they are. It’s why he keeps telling us about the cost and not wanting to block guys three years away as if those are valid excusesGod, I hope Adams can find a better goaltender than Dell and Tokarski.
Well, he's not an idiot, there must be some reason and these are not the owners, since we are below the floor of the cap. Levi and Portillo are still 2-3 years from the NHL. UPL has proven nothing and gets injured. Anderson I think will be not bad backup for 20-25 games without a heavy load, but we need a starter, or at least a goalie who could become a starter. I already agree even to some Vanecek or something similar.He knows where they are. It’s why he keeps telling us about the cost and not wanting to block guys three years away as if those are valid excuses
Will Terry let him ?God, I hope Adams can find a better goaltender than Dell and Tokarski.
But what about Terry? They need to reach the floor of the cap anyway, especially not all goalies are expensive.Will Terry let him ?
No…I’d think about 41. The capspace take from ulmark would help them a lot. But we don’t need or want Ullmark for 4 more yearsWould you guys do 28 for Ullmark and Carlo? Gives them a bunch of cap space and fills some holes for us.
Would you guys do 28 for Ullmark and Carlo? Gives them a bunch of cap space and fills some holes for us.
No…I’d think about 41. The capspace take from ulmark would help them a lot. But we don’t need or want Ullmark for 4 more years
Supposedly a lot of their fans aren't big on him and would rather have the cap space.Why would they be adding Carlo?
Nix ullmark sucks keep drafting build correct wayWould you guys do 28 for Ullmark and Carlo? Gives them a bunch of cap space and fills some holes for us.