Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,235
- 9,426
What would that look like? 6 years $40M? Maybe up to $50M?
I was thinking 3.5 and 6.5 for the last 2 arb years and then 3 x 10 tacked on top. 40/5 total.
What would that look like? 6 years $40M? Maybe up to $50M?
Without looking at any other comps, that's pretty much exactly what I was thinking, maybe with one more year to make it 6/50. Maybe you can get it a bit lower because of the injury risk, but somewhere in that range feels reasonable.I was thinking 3.5 and 6.5 for the last 2 arb years and then 3 x 10 tacked on top. 40/5 total.
That would mitigate risk....if I'm the Jays, I push for this huge.Without looking at any other comps, that's pretty much exactly what I was thinking, maybe with one more year to make it 6/50. Maybe you can get it a bit lower because of the injury risk, but somewhere in that range feels reasonable.
I for one want the baseball players I cheer to act like they're working for an accountant firm and never show any signs that they might be having fun.
Tbh what would really work is if they played the entire game in suits and only showed emotion through a cordial handshake.
I for one want the baseball players I cheer to act like they're working for an accountant firm and never show any signs that they might be having fun.
Tbh what would really work is if they played the entire game in suits and only showed emotion through a cordial handshake.
I don’t know why I but I have a feeling this is Espinal+ for Hendriks+.
Problem with trading Espinal is who’s the backup SS?
I wouldn't really understand trading Espinal at this point. You'd essentially be relying on Barger or some other minor leaguer as your backup SS/3B. Unless someone else was brought in I guess but then I don't see the point.
Otto Lopez?Problem with trading Espinal is who’s the backup SS?
I wouldn't really understand trading Espinal at this point. You'd essentially be relying on Barger or some other minor leaguer as your backup SS/3B. Unless someone else was brought in I guess but then I don't see the point.
Kirk isnt a free agent until 2027 but I am down to try and lock him up as he can always be a DH if he cant handle catching in the futureIf Kirk repeats last year’s performance in 2023, I would offer him the same contract and he should take it. Please.
Another great signing by AA. Just amazing.
I would prefer to wait out those 6 years of control and see how the body holds up. No reason to rush to lock everyone up when your a larger market team that can pay to the tax threshold.Kirk isnt a free agent until 2027 but I am down to try and lock him up as he can always be a DH if he cant handle catching in the future
I thought Bo was moving to 2nd base next year??????????? Espy i think is starting SS .. Bo has led majors in errors and fielding past 3 years .. someone said his errors led to 12 games lost as a result of just his throws to 1st baseProblem with trading Espinal is who’s the backup SS?
Nope. Not happening, and I doubt the 12 games is an actual stat.I thought Bo was moving to 2nd base next year??????????? Espy i think is starting SS .. Bo has led majors in errors and fielding past 3 years .. someone said his errors led to 12 games lost as a result of just his throws to 1st base
I don’t know why I but I have a feeling this is Espinal+ for Hendriks+.
I’d be fine with it.I thought Bo was moving to 2nd base next year??????????? Espy i think is starting SS .. Bo has led majors in errors and fielding past 3 years .. someone said his errors led to 12 games lost as a result of just his throws to 1st base
No way Chicago does that unless they really value saving moneyEspinal+Cimber for Hendriks+Kopech?