Odd with Top Prospects and Top Organizations

[john g]

Oddity with Top Prospects and Top Organizations

glancing at the new frontpage layout I spyed that in the Top 50 prospects, Columbus has the numbers 1 and 2 players (NZ and PL). then wondering, hmm I wonder what that ranks CLB, I was shocked to see that they were 25th overall.

now i know the rest of their depth pool is limited b/c of guys like Nash jumping in right away, and just plainly that the rest of their prospects arent that good. fritsche was in the mix too as I dont believe that these were done after the start of the season.

anyone else find this odd? math doesnt add up to me

Click to read more...

 

[dem]

All of the prospects on the top50 thing are columbus prospects. I assume its just a placeholder until they finish up the redesign.

 

[Predatore]

um? That is not the top 50 list you see there on the frontpage. All of those are Blue Jackets players if I'm not wrong.

My guess is that you'll have to wait a while for the top 50 to be posted, right now the ranking just "picks up" more or less randomly from the player db, it seems.

 

[john g]

in the immortal words of Homer Simpson.......dohhhhhhh

guess thats what I get for not looking past #2.....what a dummy

www.rif.org

 

[Aaron Vickers]

It's true, it's true...

We're Dominating The World!!!!!!!!!!

The top 'X' amount of prospects are Jacket players, look out for us in 2006!!!!!!!!!!