Proposal: NYR & VAN

[Heckler81]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

Click to read more...

 

[Peter Griffin]

Canucks would want more.

 

[common12]

I would imagine a team that trades for him would sign him long term and not use him as a rental. That team is not the Rangers.

 

[Kupo]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

Do you watch hockey? Boeser is a hell of a lot more valuable than Lundkvist. And we wouldn’t be able to afford him anyway.

Why do all of your proposals suck?

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

Just end all Canucks trade proposals right now.

Every one of them are shit.

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Rangers can't afford him, they can't give a payday to yet another winger. and he doesn't really move the needle as a rental.

I imagine the canucks would get a better deal for him anyway.

not a good trade

 

[One Winged Angel]

There’s no way the Rangers trade for Boeser.

 

[elitepete]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

Canucks decline. Just give us your first and a b prospect

 

[Lays]

Canucks would want more and Boeser doesn’t really fit on NYR

 

[FoxysExpensiveNYDigs]

Cant pay him.

 

[SelltheTeamFrancesco]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

Lol no. We don't want Lundkvist.

 

[Gstank]

No Chytil, Lundkvist and a 1st? Im shocked

 

[The Crypto Guy]

No thank you from the Rangers. Doens't fit a need. If we are trading Lundkvist we want a center or younger player who isnt about to a 6M+ contract.

 

[bernmeister]

Canucks would want more.

this ^...

I would imagine a team that trades for him would sign him long term and not use him as a rental. That team is not the Rangers.

...x2

Rangers can't afford him, they can't give a payday to yet another winger. and he doesn't really move the needle as a rental.

I imagine the canucks would get a better deal for him anyway.

not a good trade

... x3

 

[Rydev]

Just end all Canucks trade proposals right now.

Every one of them are shit.

Saw one a few days back that was Ty Smith+Pavel Zacha and a 2nd or 3rd for Brock Boeser and maybe a smaller cap dump, maybe Dickenson as he was rumored

that seemed like a good deal to me for both sides. I am in fact a Devils fan but I do my best to be as unbiased as possible

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Saw one a few days back that was Ty Smith+Pavel Zacha and a 2nd or 3rd for Brock Boeser and maybe a smaller cap dump, maybe Dickenson as he was rumored

that seemed like a good deal to me for both sides. I am in fact a Devils fan but I do my best to be as unbiased as possible

Where did you see this?

 

[Rydev]

Where did you see this?

The specific rumors of Zacha and Smith being liked by VAN and Devils being in on Dickenson and Boeser, all separate rumors, are their own threads here on this website

The specific trade offer I made was me seeing someone offer Zacha+Smith for Boeser, and I tweaked it for more value for VAN

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

The specific rumors of Zacha and Smith being liked by VAN and Devils being in on Dickenson and Boeser, all separate rumors, are their own threads here on this website

The specific trade offer I made was me seeing someone offer Zacha+Smith for Boeser, and I tweaked it for more value for VAN

Ohhh it was made on here, that makes more sense.

 

[Just a Fan]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

That’s not near enough for Boeser.

 

[Barnaby]

Not enough for Boeser and the Rangers shouldn’t give up what it would take considering they can’t afford to extend him. Pass.

 

[Sparksrus3]

The Rangers need scoring on the RW with Kakko out. Kakko is also a wild card.

NYR trade:

Lundkvist

Van trade:

Boeser

Boeser is a proven 20+ goal scorer which will help the Rangers this year in the playoffs.

Lundkvist has a ton of potential and has the capability of being an offensive top 4.

It would cost Kakki PooPoo and Lundkvist and more to get Boeser

 

[FoxysExpensiveNYDigs]

It would cost Kakki PooPoo and Lundkvist and more to get Boeser

Lol pass
Boeser and his 8 even strength goals arent worth it especially with his massive QO looming.

 

[Canadian Canuck]

This makes zero sense in the world.
1. Boeser is worth a hell of a lot more.
2. Rangers can't afford Boeser nor should acquire a winger.

 

[McJedi]

Vancouver says no.