Eklund Rumor: NYR, Habs, Bruins heating up "big time" for Shattenkirk

[Skinnyjimmy08]

oh what the heck, another Eklund rumor.....

On Shattenkirk...

Hearing this is heating up big time and really is down to three teams. Montreal, Boston and NY Rangers...


http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklu...-Three-teams-in-on-Shattenkirk--Buzz1/1/78332

Click to read more...

 

[Mr Tadakichi]

So now Montreal is in the mix as well, huh?

 

[Skinnyjimmy08]

So now Montreal is in the mix as well, huh?

Landeskog and Shattenkirk to Habs

 

[Mike Hasselhoffman]

As much as I'd love to have Shattenkirk on the Habs, I don't think we have the assets required to acquire him. Anyone that St. Louis would want from us is likely considered untouchable, and anything we'd be willing to trade, St. Louis can do better elsewhere

 

[Gardner McKay]

oh what the heck, another Eklund rumor.....

On Shattenkirk...

Hearing this is heating up big time and really is down to three teams. Montreal, Boston and NY Rangers...

You don't say. In other news, Dallas is looking for a goaltender, the Rangers want to get rid of Dan Girardi and the Red Wings are hoping to sign Mrazek to a deal as cheap as possible. In other words... common sense.

 

[MXD]

Wait...
Has Eklund ever did something like "Player X to Arizona, New Jersey and Florida" ?

 

[Srsly]

I wish the blues would trade him so we could stop hearing half baked theories on destinations. I expect someone random like NJ to make the trade out of left field.

 

[FLYLine27*]

So now Montreal is in the mix as well, huh?

Click bait for the Habs fans.

He's really been putting out the fake rumors as of late, must have a lot of credit card debt.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

So Eklund says Montreal, New York Rangers and Boston Bruins are all after Shattenkirk. Pretty sure you can add tons of teams to this list as well. Pretty sure that Detroit still has interest in Shatty. Rangers and Bruins are obvious choices for him. We shall see in a month or so.

 

[Super Cake]

As much as I'd love to have Shattenkirk on the Habs, I don't think we have the assets required to acquire him. Anyone that St. Louis would want from us is likely considered untouchable, and anything we'd be willing to trade, St. Louis can do better elsewhere

After the Subban trade, is anyone really untouchable on the Habs?

 

[bleedblue1223]

If Montreal is dumb enough to trade Subban for Weber, then they are dumb enough to trade Galchenyuk for Shattenkirk.

 

[Gardner McKay]

Considering Larry Brooks has already shown part of this rumor to be blatantly false, I am going to assume the rest of it is until a something else comes up.