I could be wrong but I feel like we were only a good analytics team in the first half of the season.The Rangers have a big discrepancy between the analytics and actual performance this season. We've also lost an outlier amount of close games. You can chalk it up to bad luck but I think it is more bad coaching and Gorton/JD enabling it.
Gorton must not believe faceoffs are valuable in the analytics era. Never win a powerplay face off, never win a draw in general. Dead last in hockey and never addressing that is ridiculous. I know some don’t believe in faceoffs, but that’s fundamentals.I could be wrong but I feel like we were only a good analytics team in the first half of the season.
Not a bad thing to base it on....
Did you feel Gorton and Davidson were infallible? I’m curious. Because there are many things you can knock them on. Sure, they added talent, but two lottery picks landed in their lap, so did Fox and Panarin.It's so much easier when you just ignore his approach from 1997-2002, or forget the Knicks of...well...the 21st century this far.
You know, when you take away all the DUIs and speeding tickets, the driving record looks pretty clean.
You're right, we've been bottom 10 or so in the 2nd half of the season. It's really our PP and PK carrying us.I could be wrong but I feel like we were only a good analytics team in the first half of the season.
Did you feel Gorton and Davidson were infallible? I’m curious
I believe when the owner is sinking his money into guys like Panarin, Kreider, Trouba, DeAngelo (nearly $200M) in contracts, absorbing buyouts on Shattenkirk and Hank, he expects to be competitive at least. The last couple of weeks have been anything but that. They failed to address severe lack of grit and character in the bottom six like Carolina has in guys like Martinook, Foegele, McGinn, etc, and the DeAngelo fiasco that loomed large, etc. I just think if Dolan replaced them with a Messier or complete hack pushover it would be one thing. Drury is someone more people should be confident in.No, not at all.
I definitely felt like they were building what needed to be built and had done a very good of assembling it to this point. They certainly didn't win every decision, but I felt comfortable with far more of what they'd done over the last 36 months and what they were still aiming to do.
I believe when the owner is sinking his money into guys like Panarin, Kreider, Trouba, DeAngelo (nearly $200M) in contracts, absorbing buyouts on Shattenkirk and Hank, he expects to be competitive at least. The last couple of weeks have been anything but that. They failed to address severe lack of grit and character in the bottom six like Carolina has in guys like Martinook, Foegele, McGinn, etc, and the DeAngelo fiasco that loomed large, etc. I just think if Dolan replaced them with a Messier or complete hack pushover it would be one thing. Drury is someone more people should be confident in.
I mean DeAngelo’a buyout won’t cost Gorton, it just means Dolan is out that money that was virtually thrown down the drain. For a guy that they should’ve cashed in on, value-wise, not just sent him home. Lundqvist was a Gorton buyout. Sure, Sather paid him, but still. I guess we will see what happens.I have no real problem with Drury, save for the fact that he was a key voice in the same team that has all the problems so the whole "failing to address" component would also include him.
I have no problem with expectations either, though I think there are appropriate expectations for different points in time.
The buyouts are largely beginning to come off the books --- with someone like ADA being a virtual non-factor.
Some of those buyouts, including Hank and Girardi, were also handed out by Gorton's predecessor --- who is still here.
I don't think the needs of the team were a blindspot. In fact, I'd dare say everyone was aware of them. The question was to what extent you can address them since the Carolina series. Either the solutions were not available, were not interested, or were cost prohibitive.
Coming back from the store without something on the list doesn't always mean that someone forgot to pick up the item in question. Sometimes it wasn't on the shelf, or it really wasn't a price you wanted to pay.
You're right, we didn't address the issues like Carolina did. And in that same vein, Carolina picked in the top 10 5 times between 2010 and 2018, and the top 12 another two times in that span. They moved evaluated players and moved players to fill holes. We are just not hitting that point. We're not comparing two teams working in the same time frame.
Not for nothing everything Dolan said in that article has been said here many many times by multiple posters.
a lack of leadership from the top down was apparent and it has been getting worse for 2 years now. We’ve had nothing but drama
and it’s been in all facets of the organization as he pointed out. Including don’t be fooled the buddy bull shit of signing jack johnson and hiring of jd’s kid.
Dolan did the right thing. He like us sees way too much talent to let it go to waste under a regime he did not trust.
I mean DeAngelo’a buyout won’t cost Gorton, it just means Dolan is out that money that was virtually thrown down the drain. For a guy that they should’ve cashed in on, value-wise, not just sent him home. Lundqvist was a Gorton buyout. Sure, Sather paid him, but still. I guess we will see what happens.
There was also a solid chance Drury is gone this off-season if he’s offered another job. Maybe Sather and Dolan knew Drury was the man moving forward and they couldn’t afford to lose him, especially after a down year.Girardi was a Sather contract.
Staal was a Sather contract.
Lundqvist was a Sather contract.
That right there are contracts we either had to buy out to move forward, or had to give a pick away to be rid of. That's more of Dolan's money that he's giving to ADA with a buyout.
There was no path forward with Lundqvist. He didn't want to be a backup. He didn't want to stay in that role. You're left with two choices there --- pay him to sit and piss him off (and move a contract in order to do it), or you bite the bullet and buy him out.
I mean Sather had years to throw Dolan's money at Redden, and Gomez and Drury and other guys who, frankly, failed miserably. So I don't see how Dolan now suddenly said "Oh crap, that's my money what are you doing?!?!"
I feel like this is a move you make a year from now if things really aren't addressed, if a regular schedule doesn't produce results and if we're not getting the returns on the young talent (aka the real core of the rebuild).
That's where the timing component comes in. This feels like a move you "could" do but probably wouldn't qualify as "should" do. I also don't buy the Drury exit interview line either --- he's literally been in every exit interview since he started working with the front office.
"Drury has our support. Ha ha." - Sam RosenFor those of us stuck in MSNBC hell last night and tonight, can someone post any of the most interesting comments Valiquette or Sam make on MSG?
That article kind of eases me a bit but at the same time, only further proves that Dolan's an idiot. I feel like the reasons that are cited there are reasons why you blow up the coaching staff, not the management. We have the talent to win the Cup but there was a weakness in the team? Who does that fall on, Jim?
But like I said, it eases me in the sense that as usual he praises Sather and it seems like he's gonna have a more prominent role than he did the past two years. Ideally Drury has final call on everything and runs hockey ops and Glen acts as that buffer to ease Dolan so that he can run the show.
There was also a solid chance Drury is gone this off-season if he’s offered another job. Maybe Sather and Dolan knew Drury was the man moving forward and they couldn’t afford to lose him, especially after a down year.
A lot of the company line. Really nothing of note. Either Sam had a cold or was really emotional.For those of us stuck in MSNBC hell last night and tonight, can someone post any of the most interesting comments Valiquette or Sam make on MSG?
Dolan knows Drury as the fat kid who won the LLWS from some place in Connecticut. He knows it wasn't Westport, Greenwich or New Canaan.There was also a solid chance Drury is gone this off-season if he’s offered another job. Maybe Sather and Dolan knew Drury was the man moving forward and they couldn’t afford to lose him, especially after a down year.